@oblomov Hi there! Wow, I’m impressed by the analysis you’ve made on the logo! I can confirm your hypothesis that it I designed it visually (its proportions and such). I’m not sure if I calculated somehow the rotation of the pentagram so it fits a square on all sides. Actually, I’m just checking right now and the fit is not perfect (in mm, it is 173,226 x 173,282), but certainly good enough for the objective: that the center of the pentagram is the center of the square and that the limits of the image are square [enough] so that if it is used as an avatar, the usual masking of the avatar image as a circle leaves the pentagram at the center, and, therefore, it is not cut somehow uglily. Also, I hadn’t come across Cormullion’s procedural verision of it written in Julia, and its fractal versions and animations! I attach the animation, wonderful! I guess it’s @cormullion on the #Fediverse?
I love the love put into it 💞. I’m also a bit torn as to the proposal of the asterism ⁂ as a new logo. I like it very much, and actually even more than the pentacle, with more possibilities and variations (see this old post of mine, for example). Maybe some emotional attachment prevents me from jumping into the new one (adding the asterism to my name, as some people are doing, for example).
Anyway, I enjoy seeing the paths this logo and other proposals are taking, the conversations around it (even around the need for a logo at all). Humans connecting, after all!