#InsurrectionAct

2025-12-02

Just what #Minneapolis needs, more #PoliceBrutality against #Black people. This time courtesy of #ICE & #CBP. #Trump is desperate to use the #InsurrectionAct.

The Trump admin is set to begin an operation targeting #Somali #immigrants in the Minneapolis - #StPaul region, acc/to an official person with knowledge of the plan & documents. The ICE op comes as Trump has used increasingly “inflammatory” [#racist] language to attack #Somalis in recent days.

#law #immigration
nytimes.com/2025/12/02/us/poli

A Guy Named Brian (he/him)GuyNamedBrian
2025-11-03

This has been the plan all along: “The president and several others in his inner circle — most notably Stephen Miller, a senior aide to Trump in his first term, and now Trump's right hand man on immigration — have long talked about using the National Guard to help with mass deportations and immigration raids, despite U.S. laws broadly preventing the military from being used for domestic policing.”

npr.org/2025/11/03/nx-s1-55931

Robert Reich asks, could over 23,000 National Guard troops trained for civil unrest signal a crackdown? Trump plans to deploy military forces, invoking the Insurrection Act to suppress protests—claiming unchecked authority. Yet, peaceful resistance remains the answer against authoritarian overreach: alternet.org/trump-cant-scare- #CivilRights #Trump #InsurrectionAct #Democracy

A Guy Named Brian (he/him)GuyNamedBrian
2025-10-31

The regime would love nothing more than to invoke the Insurrection Act, even if they have to provoke it: “The establishment of a domestic quick reaction force to quell civil disturbances at a time when there are no civil disturbances that can’t be handled easily by existing law enforcement suggests the administration is expecting those conditions to change.”

heathercoxrichardson.substack.

Don Curren 🇨🇦🇺🇦dbcurren.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
2025-10-31

When asked by a reporter later to clarify his remarks, #Trump referred back to the #InsurrectionAct, saying that if he invoked it, “I’d be allowed to do whatever I want …” open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...

October 30, 2025

2025-10-30

@MugsysRapSheet - So, this was one of the GoogleAI sources cited (I also found it on my own).

#MovementLawLab - No Troops in our Cities: What You Need to Know if President #Trump Attempts to Deploy #NationalGuard Units in Your Area

"#KnowYourRights

You have the same rights under the U.S. Constitution and state law regardless if the law enforcement officer: National Guard, police, ICE, FBI, military troops, etc. It’ s important to know & assert your rights!

What is the National Guard?

The National Guard is a military force composed of the Army and Air National Guard who are engaged on an as-needed basis in states and D.C. The National Guard is commanded by the Governor.

#PosseComitatusAct & #InsurrectionAct

Under federal law, the military cannot engage in civilian law enforcement: they cannot stop, search or arrest civilians
Under martial law, a military commander has the authority to make and enforce laws and suspend existing laws. By contrast, the Insurrection Act generally permits the military to assist civilian authorities, not take their place. Under current law, the president has no authority to declare martial law (and any declarations would be subject to judicial review).

When Can the National Guard Be Deployed in Your City by the President?

These deployments are unnecessary, immoral, and are unconstitutional and illegal when invoked without the consent of the State Governor.

National Guard may be deployed by POTUS to execute state/federal missions with the consent of a State Governor. POTUS may also invoke the National Guard to be deployed in a state for a limited set of circumstances, with or without the consent of that Governor. If the President federalizes the National Guard, the National Guard is under the same chain of command as active-duty military, with federalized troops now falling under the command of the Secretary of Defense and POTUS.

In this case he could do it under the following:

SCENARIOS OF NATIONAL GUARD DEPLOYMENT WITHOUT CONSENT:

The President can deploy troops if a State’s Governor asks for aid to suppress an insurrection in the state. (Title 10 USC § 251).

The President can deploy troops to suppress an “insurrection,” “rebellion” or “domestic violence” that prevents the execution of laws with or without the consent of the Governor. (The Insurrection Act, Title 10 USC §§ 251-55).

The President can deploy troops to stop an “invasion” by a foreign nation, a “rebellion” against the authority of the government of the U.S. or is unable to
execute the law. (Title 10 USC § 12406)."

movementlawlab.org/nationalgua.

PDF link to #NationalGuardPrimer:
static1.squarespace.com/static

2025-10-30

@MugsysRapSheet So, I went further with the prompt you started with...

"In #Maine, the #NationalGuard’s arrest authority depends on whether they are serving under state or federal control — just like in other states — but Maine law provides some specific details. Here’s a clear breakdown:
________________________________________
⚖️ 1. When the Maine National Guard Is Under State Control
(“State Active Duty” or Title 32 status)
• Command: The Governor of Maine (as Commander-in-Chief).
• Legal Basis:
o Maine Constitution, Article V, Part 1, § 7
o Maine Revised Statutes, Title 37-B (“Defense, Veterans and Emergency Management”)
o §181-A and §182 are key sections covering the Guard’s use in state service.
🔹 Authority to Enforce Laws and Make Arrests
When the Guard is activated for state service, such as in a natural disaster, riot, or other emergency:
• Title 37-B, §181-A(3) explicitly allows the Governor to assign the National Guard to support civil authorities in enforcing the law and maintaining public order.
• Guardsmen may be temporarily endowed with law enforcement powers, including detaining or arresting individuals, if authorized by the Governor or the Adjutant General under state law.
• In practice, the Guard acts in support of civilian police, often to enforce curfews, protect infrastructure, or manage crowds.
📘 Example: If Maine experienced widespread civil unrest, the Governor could deploy the Guard to assist Maine State Police or local law enforcement in enforcing laws and detaining violators.

🔴 2. When the Maine National Guard Is Federalized
(“Title 10” status — under Presidential control)
• Command: The President of the United States.
• Legal Basis: Federal law under Title 10, U.S. Code.
• Effect: The Guard becomes part of the U.S. Army or U.S. Air Force.
Under the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. § 1385), these federalized troops cannot perform civilian law enforcement duties — including making arrests, searching property, or seizing evidence — unless specifically authorized by Congress, such as under the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255).
So:
• Federalized Maine Guardsmen → ❌ No arrest authority over civilians.
• State-controlled Maine Guardsmen → ✅ Arrest/detention authority, when authorized by the Governor under Title 37-B."

You were right!!!

#NationalGuard #KnowYourRights #KYR #NationalGuardReactionForces #PosseComitatus #PosseComitatusAct #InsurrectionAct

2025-10-30

Resources for #OccupiedCities: including #KYR Materials

Basic constitutional rights are under attack. We need to educate, agitate and organize quickly, deeply and strategically. This document is a shared resource for organizations and leaders who are stepping up to meet this moment.

GoogleDoc:
docs.google.com/document/d/17E

#USPol #PosseComitatus #PosseComitatusAct #InsurrectionAct #KnowYourRights #OccupiedCities #SilencingDissent #NationalGuard #NationalGuardReactionForces #DHS #ICE

The USA Potatousa@murica.website
2025-10-29

Trump Claims He Can Send “Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines” Into US Cities

“I’d be allowed to do whatever I want. The courts wouldn’t get involved,” Trump said.

murica.website/2025/10/trump-c

Steve Dustcircle 🌹dustcircle@masto.ai
2025-10-28
The USA Potatousa@murica.website
2025-10-20

Trump Wrongly Claims He Can Invoke Insurrection Act to Shut Down Courts

The president hinted that he may invoke the Insurrection Act to send the US military into San Francisco.

murica.website/2025/10/trump-w

2025-10-20

Trump:🚨the MIL is now paid not by act of Congress but at his personal discretion seems like the sort of thing that could be abused.

The #InsurrectionAct does nothing except you can then use soldiers as cops -can enforce laws, but *the same old laws -doesn’t suspend the CON.⚡No martial law/closing crts/removing state ofcls...

Further exp of the use of the MIL within the US: bad, but -doesn’t do away with the CON/laws.

Sat gave me⬆️hope: CON/law will hold.
#Fascism #USPol
thebulwark.com/p/long-live-no-

The Chaotic Good🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈aminorjourney@insearchofportlandia.com
2025-10-19
2025-10-18

Sollte #Trump jetzt wegen #NoKings den #InsurrectionAct ausrufen, dann darf #Europa nur eins machen: Die #USA aus der #NATO schmeißen und jegliche Diplomatie einstellen.

StacesCases2 🇨🇦 📎stacescases2.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy
2025-10-18

Senator #JeffreyMerkley (D- #Oregon) says Trump is STAGING a FAKE riot to invoke the #InsurrectionAct

Touaregtweettouaregtweet
2025-10-17

"Simon Marks joins James O'Brien to discuss the latest in US news after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused the Democratic voting base of being terrorists and violent criminals.
During an appearance on Fox News on Thursday afternoon, Leavitt told the hosts that the Democratic Party's "main constituency" is "Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals."

youtube.com/watch?v=xQAgAlEFtoM

2025-10-17

#uspol #NoKings #InsurrectionAct
Seeing some media chatter that Trump could attempt to invoke the Insurrection Act during NoKings tomorrow

My guess is the military would be unable to respond until after the protests are over unless given warning orders NOW. Trump has been chomping at the bit for it all year, and he need not even care about attempting to suppress the protests to use this as a fake reason.

This is NOT grounds to pull back on the protests as he can easily make up an excuse anytime he wants. Rather it means we must be prepared for this possiblity.

A Medium article asks "Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act Amidst the No King's Day Protest?
2025-10-16

Trump keeps name-checking the Insurrection Act as way to deploy troops

There are few laws President Trump name-checks more frequently than the Insurrection Act. A 200-year-old constellation of statutes,…
#NewsBeep #News #Headlines #administration #appellatecourt #deployment #federallaw #insurrectionact #kevincarroll #koh #legalexpert #militaryadvisor #Point #president #protester #statute #troop #Trump #UnitedStates #Us #USA
newsbeep.com/189627/

#InsurrectionAct #history

"On July 23, 1967, authorities in Detroit raided an unlicensed drinking establishment in a predominantly Black neighborhood, infuriating residents who viewed the action as a continuation of unfair police treatment.

That incident led to a five-day uprising that resulted in 43 deaths, more than 7,000 injuries and at least 1,000 burned buildings.

In 2016 and 2017, more than 800 people were arrested protesting the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which would carry crude oil from North Dakota to Illinois.

The Standing Rock Sioux claimed the pipeline would damage the water supply on its reservation. During one of the protests, a video showed private security using pepper spray and dogs to attack the gathering crowd. A regional protest turned national as people recoiled at the brutality.

In the late spring of 2020, Americans protested the deaths of Breonna Taylor in Louisville and George Floyd in Minneapolis, both killed at the hands of police. The nationwide protests, some violent, ushered in a short-lived racial reckoning that placed a spotlight on inequality and racism.

Why we are headed towards'enough'

These examples show that Americans take action when they’ve had enough.

We’re reaching the time of 'had enough.'

Los Angeles has had enough. Portland has had enough. Chicago has had enough.

The federal government has needlessly deployed troops in American cities and used masked authorities to, in some cases, detain American citizens for no reason.

Now, the government is considering implementing the Insurrection Act, which would allow President Donald Trump to deploy the military for law enforcement purposes.

Forget the risk of civil war. That phrase, used as a talking point by some pundits, brings to mind 1861 to 1865. Americans aren’t going to pick a side, grab a firearm and shoot an anti-Trump neighbor. At least I hope not.

Trump's excuse may be coming

There’s a greater chance that the country sees a repeat of Detroit, Louisville and Minneapolis. In those cases, the public had enough and exploded with rage. People were hurt. People died. And in each case, the events sparked a round of self-reflection on what the country should be.

If violence erupts, that will give the administration an excuse to send more troops and crush, in their words, insurrectionists. That strategy might work, but history shows it often doesn’t. It also shows us how one incident can mushroom into something no one could have predicted.

The Kent State shooting in 1970 killed four students, injured nine and resulted in increased anti-war protests that mushroomed with the release of the Pentagon Papers, which exposed the government’s lies about the Vietnam War.

The release of the papers started the death spiral of the Nixon presidency.

(. . .)

We know how that turned out for Nixon.

I’m not predicting mass violence and troops fighting Americans in the streets. We all should avoid and condemn violence, full stop.

I am saying that we now face a good chance of the civil disobedience that’s happened at many points in our history. Whether it’s the Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783, University of Dayton students chasing masked Klansmen off campus in 1923, or Toledo residents rising up against Neo Nazis in 2005, people act when they’ve had enough.

Had enough is coming.

Fast."

dispatch.com/story/opinion/col

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst