#esoteric

Minetosh 🇪🇺 🇩🇪 🇨🇵 🐧 🎶Minetosh@ieji.de
2026-02-07

Album du jour
Voici un nouvel article de ma série où je vous présente un album que j'écoute en ce moment ou que j'apprécie tout simplement. La sélection est irrégulière et aléatoire. Il ne s'agit pas forcément de #metal, ni d'une nouveauté.
Tous ces albums font partie de ma collection (Vinyle, CD, FLAC, MP3, etc.).

Album du jour :
Esoteric (UK) – The Maniacal Vale (2008)

Funeral-Doom dans toute sa splendeur

#Metal #esoteric #doom #FuneralDoom #musik #music #musique #minetosh

Pochette de l'album The Maniacal Vale du groupe Esoteric, sorti en 2008
Minetosh 🇪🇺 🇩🇪 🇨🇵 🐧 🎶Minetosh@ieji.de
2026-02-07

Album of the Day
Another installment in my series of posts where I present an album I'm currently listening to or simply enjoy. These are irregular and randomly selected. It doesn't always have to be #Metal, and it won't always be a recent release.
But all of these albums are part of my collection (Vinyl, CD, FLAC, MP3, etc.).

Today's Album of the Day:
Esoteric (UK) –The Maniacal Vale (2008)

Funeral Doom at its best

#Metal #esoteric #doom #FuneralDoom #musik #music #musique #minetosh

Cover of the album The Maniacal Vale by the band Esoteric from 2008
Minetosh 🇪🇺 🇩🇪 🇨🇵 🐧 🎶Minetosh@ieji.de
2026-02-07

Album des Tages
Eine weitere Folge in der Reihe meiner Posts in denen ich ein Album vorstelle, das ich gerade höre oder einfach nur mag. In unregelmäßiger Folge und auch zufällig ausgewählt. Muss und wird nicht immer #Metal sein. Es werden auch nicht immer aktuelle Alben sein.
Aber alle dieser Alben sind Teil meiner Sammlung (Vinyl, CD, FLAC, MP3, ...)

Heutiges Album des Tages:
Esoteric (UK) – The Maniacal Vale (2008)

Funeral-Doom in Vollendung

#Metal #esoteric #doom #FuneralDoom #musik #music #musique #minetosh

Cover des Albums  The Maniacal Vale von der Band Esoteric aus dem Jahr 2008

Who Gets to Speak On Discord, Who Gets Banned, and Why That’s Always Political in Spaces with No Politics Rules

So, a thing I find very interesting about the fragility of the esteem among chronic Discord users is that it’s common for admins and moderators to ban or make fun of people who leave. Essentially, they’re responding to being rejected or not chosen, so they think it’s reasonable to retaliate

A Discord server I am lurking in has a “no politics” rule and is a religious, esoteric, and philosophical server. What I find very funny about this is that politics is:

“Politics is who gets what, when, and how.”

— Harold D. Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, How (1936)

I find it very funny that the most minimal form of being “not political” in a virtual community is a Temporary Autonomous Zone (TAZ). I was part of an IRC chaos magick channel when I was a teenager, and I submitted to a zine under my old handle (which is not Rayn) when I was 20. No, I’m not going to reveal the name I wrote under, which was published in chaos magick zines back in the day, because I’ve had a bucket of crazies following me around since 2008, with the insane network of anarchists circa 2020 being the latest instance.

ChanServ was a bot used on IRC (Internet Relay Chat) networks to manage channel operations such as bans, who got voiced, and permissions. Think of it as an early, early moderation bot. In an IRC TAZ, everyone who entered got all the permissions from Chanserv, so anyone could ban, voice, unban, deop, or op anyone else. No one had more power than anyone else, so there was minimal negotiation over channel resources. A TAZ is still an inherently political construct; however, it is a minimal political construct because there is minimal negotiation of resources and an equal, random, and chaotic authority structure. That’s not Discord, though.

Discord inherently has a hierarchical system defined by roles, a TOS, and members are expected to abide by the rules of that server. So, when you say there is a no-politics rule on Discord, you are inherently contradicting yourself because Discord is structurally political in how you, as a moderator, interact with others. How people negotiate conversations and interact with each other to access the resources of your Discord server is inherently political.

Discord’s structure makes any “no-politics” rule itself a political act. Moderators exercise power by granting, restricting, or revoking permissions, and that distribution of power is the very politics the rule tries to avoid. So while the intention is to keep discussions “apolitical,” it creates local Discord politics by determining who gets to speak and who gets silenced (e.g., banned, timed out, kicked, or limited to certain channels). A “no politics” rule shifts political dynamics into moderation decisions rather than eliminating them.

What prompted this was me observing a typical pragmatic versus moral realism argument that you’d see in any philosophy course or forum. I’m an academic and a computational scientist, but I don’t try to shut down any arguments with that, because that’s an explicit fallacy and a dishonest, bad-faith tactic.

Technically, I am a biologist. Yes, I have a biology degree and a biotech degree. I also have philosophy, mathematics, and computer science and engineering degrees under my belt. I have to work with people like this on a daily basis, and I find them insufferable, so the last thing I want to do in my free time after looking at stacks of dumbass papers is argue with people on Reddit or Discord when I could be fucking, getting fucked, or spending time with my husband. But, alas, they have no life. Keep in mind, as a computational biologist that reviews a lot of shit, I get paid to argue. These idiots are arguing on the Internet for free! The reason why Redditors, Reddit moderators, and Discord moderators get shat on so much is that all of their labor is unpaid! People with lives don’t take it that seriously!

On to the convo:

A new person in the community defined morals as: morals = {a, b, c} exhaustively. An established member of that community responded that, for them, morals are either {x, y, z…}, non-exhaustive and polymorphic, or not inherently defined by the tradition itself but supplied externally by the individual. The new person replied, effectively, “According to my definition of a, b, c, that still constitutes a moral framework.” An established member who is also a scientist pushed back as if no definition of morals had been proposed at all, when in actuality they were disagreeing with the scope and applicability of the given definition, not the act of defining itself.

By the way, the symbolic way I’m defining this is ambiguous. You have no clue what anything is; however, it is ontologically defined, and the logic makes sense. That is the problem. An ontological definition was given, so arguing that no definition was proposed—simply because they disagreed with it—is in bad faith. Personally, I am a constructivist, poststructuralist, pragmatist, instrumentalist, and anti-realist, so I don’t care too much about the realism of the ontological propositions and expressions. I am pointing out logical mistakes.

This is especially egregious when individuals rely on their authority in a domain where their degree is not pertinent. A well-known issue with scientists is that their curiosity can outstrip their morality. Essentially, an ethics board composed mostly of scientists without degrees in ethics, law, or philosophy will make poor decisions and saturate the political sphere they occupy with advocates and lobbyists to bend laws to their interests. Therefore, a board with no philosophers is pretty sinister.

Morals and ethics are philosophical problems. To my knowledge, many people who sit on ethics boards that seriously address ethical issues have philosophy, and not just astronomy, degrees. Relevant degrees include psychology, sociology, theology, philosophy, etc. For example, I have a philosophy degree, so I am technically qualified and credentialed by a university to have these discussions. An astronomy degree alone does not make someone qualified to discuss ethics—maybe if they also had a theology degree?

The thing I find really funny about this group is that they avoid dilemmas. Morals and ethics are developed through ethical dilemmas. Their response to any type of dilemma is to exert their local authority and exclude, deny, or shut down conversations.

The difference between science and philosophy is that science is a little less messy and more defined. We can all see something and agree on what we see, right? The difference with philosophical questions and moral dilemmas is that they are relatively open-ended and ambiguous. It’s really amusing to me how those who try to argue philosophy are uncomfortable with indefinite answers that are open to interpretation.

It’s just funny how they tacitly assume that they are the only academics in their field in existence and that their opinion on things is the consensus, especially on metaphysical issues where there is no consensus. No human knows what the right thing to do is all the time. It’s great to know that they have somehow achieved a level of inhuman perfection.

2026-01-22

22 small cards.
A centuries-old system.
The Etteilla Major Arcana, reimagined as stickers for notebooks, letters, and everyday rituals. 🔮

Find the set in the shop:
👉 curiousgoblin.etsy.com/listing

#tarot #Etteilla #MajorArcana #tarotStickers #stickers #sticker #stickerArt #journaling #stationery #esoteric #occult #etsyshop

2026-01-21

For tarot collectors and history lovers:
An Etteilla Major Arcana sticker set exploring one of the earliest tarot traditions. A different path from the familiar decks. 🌙

Available now:
👉 curiousgoblin.etsy.com/listing

#tarot #Etteilla #MajorArcana #tarotStickers #stickers #sticker #stickerArt #journaling #stationery #esoteric #occult #etsyshop

🌟High Magickhighmagick
2026-01-20

Golden Dawn teaches you the rules. Thelema teaches you when to break them. Which path fits you? youtu.be/AKrwelin1Bo

N-gated Hacker Newsngate
2026-01-19

🚀 Behold, the revolutionary "Nanolang," a -language so tiny it could fit in a toddler's shoebox, designed for coders who want their LLMs to speak in whispers. 🙄 Seems someone decided that existing languages weren't enough, so they concocted this pint-sized enigma for machines. 🤖 Because what we really needed was a language smaller than a tweet! 🐦
github.com/jordanhubbard/nanol

2026-01-19

Just added: Etteilla Major Arcana tarot stickers.
All 22 Major Arcana in a compact format, made for journaling, scrapbooking, and personal projects. 🔮

See the full set here:
👉 curiousgoblin.etsy.com/listing

#tarot #Etteilla #MajorArcana #tarotStickers #stickers #sticker #stickerArt #journaling #stationery #esoteric #occult #etsyshop

2026-01-16

Before modern decks, there was Etteilla.
This Major Arcana sticker set looks back to the roots of tarot, turning early symbolism into quiet companions for journals and letters. 🌙

Now available in the shop:
👉 curiousgoblin.etsy.com/listing

#tarot #Etteilla #MajorArcana #tarotStickers #stickers #sticker #stickerArt #journaling #stationery #esoteric #occult #etsyshop

2026-01-16

Snake at the Gate: Tet, Chet, and a Temperance Tarot Warning. I’m photographing the spread in the morning, then it goes live for Tarot with a Twist members (any level). This is an advanced reading blending Oracle, Lenormand, Tarot, numerology, and Hebrew letters—calling out false friends, cracked foundations, and the choices you’ve been dodging.

Want in? Become a member here: wordswithatwist.com/membership

#tarot #esoteric #lenormand

2026-01-14

New tarot stickers, this time following the Etteilla Major Arcana.
22 cards. Early symbolism. Small formats for notebooks and journals. 🔮

You can find them here:
👉 curiousgoblin.etsy.com/listing

#tarot #Etteilla #MajorArcana #tarotStickers #stickers #sticker #stickerArt #journaling #stationery #esoteric #occult #etsyshop

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst