Quoting from Nir Hason and Chen Ma'anit analysis of the Supreme Court's judicial decisions over the course of the military campaign.
Hason and Ma’anit, investigative journalists at #Haaretz who frequently cover legal and human rights issues, claim the the Supreme Court has systematically approved Israeli military actions while rejecting or indefinitely delaying petitions from human rights organizations. They contend that the court has given a "green light" to various military policies including restrictions on food, medical care, journalist access, and detention practices.
Here are some notable controversial rulings mentioned:
Yitzhak Amit (Chief Justice)
- Starvation case: Issued ruling that accepted the state's position that there was no real food shortage in Gaza, despite border closings
- Missing persons cases: Approved dismissal of petition seeking information about detained Palestinians, telling lawyer "There's an email address... what more do we need to do?"
- Red Cross access: Has delayed petition for Red Cross prison visits through 18 extension requests over a year
David Mintz (Judge)
- Starvation case: Wrote 8-page section on medieval Jewish warfare law, including discussion of:
- Wars of extermination against "seven nations"
- Amalek wars requiring genocide ("strike down man and woman, infant and suckling")
- Referenced rabbinical debates about whether starvation is permitted in warfare
- Electricity case: Previously ruled electricity was a basic necessity for Israelis, but voted to deny it to Palestinians
Noam Solberg (Deputy Chief Justice)
- Starvation case: Wrote that humanitarian aid reaching Hamas is an "oxymoron" and that "excessive humanism" prevents ending the fighting
- Various petitions: Repeatedly ruled "there is no cause for our intervention"
- Missing persons: Rejected petition from families of 62 detained Gazans seeking information
- Electricity: Ruled that restoring electricity to Gaza was not justiciable
Daphna Barak-Erez (Judge)
- Red Cross access: Did not require state to allow Red Cross visits to security prisons
- Electricity: Ruled in 2020 that electricity was essential for Israelis' dignified existence, but has not applied same standard to Palestinians
Yael Willner (Judge)
- Missing persons: Told Palestinian lawyer seeking information about detained relative: "There's an email address... what more do we need to do?"
- Various cases: Approved state positions on detention without legal representation
Ruth Ronen (Judge)
- Missing persons: Rejected petition from families of 62 detained Gazans on technical grounds
- Detention cases: Approved dismissing cases where Palestinians died in custody
Ofer Grosskopf (Judge)
- Missing persons: Approved deletion of petition after detainees died in custody
Alex Stein (Judge)
- Electricity: Ruled that restoring electricity to Gaza was not justiciable
Yosef Elron (Judge)
- Recent starvation petition: Given recent case but indicated likely dismissal after Israel announced policy changes
These rulings represent a systematic approval of policies that human rights organizations argue constitute war crimes, with the judges either rejecting petitions outright or allowing indefinite delays that render them meaningless.
From the ICJ perspective, Israel's judiciary appears to be facilitating rather than investigating alleged international crimes, systematically approving policies like starvation and forced displacement while ignoring international court orders - demonstrating "unwillingness" to provide genuine accountability and thereby triggering international jurisdiction.
Prof. Eliav Lieblich (Tel Aviv University Law Faculty) states: "It's simply unbelievable that the Supreme Court completely ignores the opinion of the international court when ruling on the same issue."
Hebrew https://www.haaretz.co.il/magazine/2025-05-21/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/00000196-f2fd-d85b-af9f-fbfd236a0000 or https://archive.is/IPxKT
@hannahpalsa
@israel
#IsraelWarCrimes
#ICJ #ICC #complementarity