#Replicability

Dutch Reproducibility NetworkDutch_Reproducibility_Network
2026-02-24

From 20-22 July, the 4th on Reproducibility and Replicability will take place in .
The conference welcomes contributions on methods, tools, case studies, and community efforts around and in research.

Deadlines: 10 March (abstracts)/17 March (papers)

acm-rep.github.io/2026/cfp/

Foto by ThisIsEngineering on unsplash

Scott M. Graffiusscottgraffius
2026-02-12

Ever wonder why some “scientific” claims sound convincing but fall apart under scrutiny?

This article explores the 3 vital rules of science. Together, they offer a powerful lens for evaluating conclusions.

🔗 scottgraffius.com/blog/files/3

2025-12-15

The final paper in our upcoming special issue on #Replicability and #Reproducibility, Joseph Holler and colleagues use open science practices to develop a GIScience study on access t oCOVID-19 healthcare in Illinois, US doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2025. #OpenAccess #GISchat

A network graph showing the evolution of seven related studies from 2020 to 2024. The timeline runs horizontally along the x-axis, with seven study names listed vertically on the left: Kang et al., CT Replication, Illinois Reproduction, Chicago Reproduction, Class Projects, VT Pharmacy Extension, and Esri Extension. Each study has a small grid showing reproducibility criteria (indicated by black and white boxes). Circles connected by lines represent different versions of each study, with solid lines indicating direct forks or pulls and dashed lines showing references. Colored symbols within or near circles indicate the type of work: green squares for reproduction, blue circles for reanalysis, red triangles for replication, and purple inverted triangles for extension. The graph shows how these studies branched, referenced, and built upon each other over time, with a note indicating that the HEGSRR template was adopted in 2022. Updates in response to reproduction efforts are noted at the top. The network demonstrates how each study reproduced, reanalyzed, replicated, or extended the original Kang et al. (2020) study (indicated by colored polygons) in sequence, improving upon different aspects of the original work (shown by black boxes in the grids).
David C. Norris 🇺🇦 🗽dcnorris@scicomm.xyz
2025-12-07

Reading a paper this morning onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 that follows Nosek & Errington (2017) elifesciences.org/articles/233 in muddling the distinction between #replicability as a broader scientific aim vs #reproducibility as captured in the narrow (purely 'computational') idea of #reproducibleresearch discussed e.g. in a #Guix context here guix.gnu.org/cookbook/en/html_.

This mistake is not uncommon, and leads (in this present paper, at least) to insufficient stress on computational reproducibility as a sine qua non of any higher-order quality attribute.

A snippet from §1.2 of 'Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity  Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0', a report from the ISPE‐ISPOR Special Task Force on Real World Evidence in Health Care  Decision Making.

"Reproducibility is a characteristic of a study or a finding. A reproducible  study is one for which independent investigators implementing the  same methods in the same data are able to obtain the same results  (direct replication [38]). In contrast, a reproducible finding is a higher  order target than a reproducible study, which can be tested by  conducting multiple studies that evaluate the same question and  estimand (target of inference) but use different data and/or apply different methodology or operational decisions (conceptual replication [38])"

Citation [38] here is Nosek & Errington (2017) https://elifesciences.org/articles/23383.pdf.
2025-11-30

An #openaccess toolbox aimed at unifying the field of auditory reverse correlation studies by providing a consistent experimental and analysis framework allowing for better #replicability and #reproducibility
fediscience.org/@LeoVarnet/115
#revcorr #revcor #psychphysics #psychology #psychoacoustics #OpenScience @psycholinguistics @psychology

Serhii Nazarovetsserhii@mstdn.science
2025-11-23

A new article by Chloe Patton shows how debates about #OpenScience often slip into absurdity – like demanding #replication from the #Humanities. You can’t replicate history, culture, or interpretation the way you replicate a physics experiment. It’s a different kind of knowledge.

:doi: doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf052

Forcing STEM-style standards onto the humanities doesn’t improve #science – it just adds bureaucracy and limits academic freedom.

#Reproducibility #ResearchEvaluation #Replicability

Patton, C. (2024). Replicability and the humanities: the problem with universal measures of research quality. Research Evaluation, 34. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf052
UniversityofGroningenLibraryBibliothecaris@social.edu.nl
2025-11-21

Have you checked out our #OpenScience Bites #podcast yet? Stay tuned!

Very soon, we’ll be talking with Felipe Romero, Assistant Professor at the Faculty of #Philosophy. From a #MetaScience perspective, we’ll dive into the concepts of #reproducibility and #replicability, and why they matter for #research practice.

We’ll let you know as soon as the new episode is online!

In the meantime, feel free to listen to our earlier episodes:

🎧 rug.nl/research/openscience/po

#PublicEngagement #OpenEducation

microphone + text "Open Science Bites"
Dennis Alexis Valin Dittrichdavdittrich@fediscience.org
2025-10-21

How Scrutiny and Iteration Made Behavioral Economics Better chicagobooth.edu/review/how-sc
"However, direct #replicability should not be confused with #generalizability or universality. While the basic patterns of behavior documented in the original experiments reliably show up in subsequent replications, their magnitudes can vary substantially across contexts. Loss aversion might be stronger in some settings than in others. Understanding this variation has become a central focus of contemporary behavioral economics research. Rather than viewing such #heterogeneity as a challenge to the field’s foundations, researchers increasingly see it as a source of insight into the underlying psychological mechanisms driving behavioral anomalies."
#BehavioralEconomics

Carolanniecarolannie@c.im
2025-07-18

Even discounting bad faith and charlatans, in the biological sciences (which I am familiar with) and probably other research, we get results... but even with meticulous lab books, it's hard to reproduce the exact same experiment and replicate the exact same results. Because we really don't know all the variables
#Science #Experiments #Replicability

Unreplicable results are an open secret | Dynamic Ecology

dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2

2025-07-03

New I4R discussion paper by Philipp Knöpfle, @drfollowmario, and me: "A Replication Report on "Political polarization of news media and
influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections" by Flamino et al. 2023
econstor.eu/handle/10419/31983
#replicability #computationalsocialscience

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌺🌞🍃mzloteanu
2025-07-02

#378 Selective Inference: The Silent Killer of Replicability

Thoughts: Benjamin overviews the replicability crisis, alternatives to p-values (and their issues), and suggests selective reporting is a large issue itself.

hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/l39r

Science ouverte UnivRennesSO_UnivRennes
2025-06-16

How to make Rscripts more reproducible with Nix package Manager : Rix for R make it possible to go a step further than using only Renv or even Docker ; see documentation here docs.ropensci.org/rix/index.ht

Science ouverte UnivRennesSO_UnivRennes
2025-06-10

Si vous êtes chercheur.se à l'Université de Rennes / Rennes 2 ou dans des écoles de l'EPE, l'atelier ARDoISE peut vous accompagner lors d'une éventuelle candidature au prix SO du logiciel libre de recherche scienceouverte.univ-rennes.fr/ ouvrirlascience.fr/les-candida

Steffen Wendzelcdpxe@dju.social
2025-06-03

How to describe #steganography methods in a comparable and unified way to aid #replicability?

We combined pre-existing methodology into a single framework. New pre-print + online tool prototype (will get improved soon) on our website: patterns.omi.uni-ulm.de/news/

Full version of the paper and the online tool will be presented at the ARES'25 CUING workshop in August.

#replicability #steganography #covertchannels #informationhiding #infosec #cybersecurity #security #research

2025-05-16

Had a great time at the CSS workshop in Mannheim organized by Ruben Bach & Valerie Hase. You can find the slides from my presentation on "Reproducibility & Replicability in Computational Social Science Research" here: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29
#reproducibility #replicability #computationalsocialscience

2025-04-24

New publication: Code-sharing policies are associated with increased #reproducibility potential of ecological findings, by @antica_c and others. #codesharing #replicability #reliability
doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.541

Figure 2 in Sánchez-Tójar et al. (2025): "Diagram visually representing the computational reproducibility potential of articles published between 2015 and 2019 in ecological journals without a code-sharing policy. The value corresponding to “Data incomplete” used in the diagram (56%) was obtained from Roche et al. (2015 ); whereas all the remaining values correspond to the survey presented in the current study. Original illustration by Szymek Drobniak."
Jesus Castagnetto 🇵🇪jmcastagnetto
2025-04-12

"Estimating the of Brazilian "

... Replication rates for these experiments varied between 15 and 45% according to five predefined criteria ...

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

2025-04-10

🎉 Our method Anisotropic Specular Image-Based Lighting Based on BRDF Major Axis Sampling has received the Replicability Stamp!
🔍 Check it out here: replicabilitystamp.org/index.h
🧑‍💻 Code & data: github.com/iota97/AnisotropyEd

#ComputerGraphics #Rendering #Replicability #OpenScience #BRDF

Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌺🌞🍃mzloteanu
2025-04-04

#315 What fraction of repeat experiments will have an effect size within the 95% confidence interval of the first experiment?

Thoughts: CV is a great place to learn. We see the same answer as Cumming: 83%

stats.stackexchange.com/questi

Dutch Reproducibility NetworkDutch_Reproducibility_Network
2025-04-04

The University for / UvH joins the NLRN as an institutional member!

At the NLRN, we want to make a range of epistemic voices heard in the discussion around and of and . With their research portofolio focusing on and humane societies, the UvH complements the voices of the other, more technical and generalistic institutions TU Delft, TU/e, RUG and escience Center.

Foto: Gaelle Marcel for Unsplash

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst