Anton and Yarvinâs May 2021 conversation was recorded for the podcast of the American Mind,
a publication of the powerful rightwing #Claremont #Institute,
where Anton is a senior fellow,
and whose growing influence during the Trump era has seen it described as the ânerve center of the American rightâ.
đĽOn 8 December, Trumpâs transition team announced that Anton would be appointed director of policy planning at the state department.
Anton also served in a communications role in Trumpâs first-term national security council from February 2017 until April 2018,
resigning the day before neoconservative John Bolton assumed the role of national security adviser.
After leaving the first Trump administration, Anton did not abandon Trump,
but continued writing about US liberal democracy in bleak terms.
In "Up from Conservatism",
a 2023 anthology of essays edited by the executive director of Claremontâs "Center for the American Way of Life", Arthur Milikh,
Anton wrote that
âthe United States peaked around 1965â,
and that Americans are ruled by
âa network of unelected bureaucrats ⌠corporate-tech-finance senior management, âexpertsâ who set the boundaries of acceptable opinion,
and media figures who police those boundariesâ.
Anton continued the discussion in sections headed
âThe universities have become evilâ,
âOur economy is fakeâ,
âThe people are corruptâ,
âOur civilization has lost the will to liveâ.
His and Yarvinâs conversation was ostensibly about his 2020 book,
"The Stakes".
That book was controversial even on the right for its prolonged consideration of autocratic âCaesarismâ
as a means of resolving American decadence.
In the book, he defined #Caesarism as a âform of one-man rule:
halfway ⌠between monarchy and tyrannyâ.
He adds, though, that
âCaesarism is not tyranny, which, strictly understood,
is a regime that usurps a legitimate and functioning governmentâ,
whereas Caesarism implements âauthoritarian one-man rule partially legitimized by necessityâ
â that is,
âthe breakdown of republican, constitutional ruleâ,
adding that
âa nation no longer capable of ruling itself must yet be ruledâ.
He writes that a
đĽâRed Caesarâ could be attractive to
âthe redsâ in the Republican coalition,
who he says are
âunder constant rhetorical, political, and, increasingly, physical attack,
especially in blue statesâ,
-- making them âmore likely to turn to a Caesarâ.
Anton stops short of openly calling for authoritarian rule,
but in general, he writes that the advantages of Caesarism include
âcontinuity and stabilityâ
and âthe prospect of avoiding conflictâ,
and that it âtends to engender calmâ.
#CurtisYarvin #MichaelAnton
#RedCaesar