Content Moderation History: do we all remember 2013-19 when online sociology pundits were everywhere expounding the need to block streaming/sharing of video of people being murdered?
It began in the wake of various atrocities (civil unrest, government oppression, rioting, live streamed mass shootings) and over generalisations which tended to cite Facebook as at least the “amplifier” if not the “cause” of violence, especially due to risk of “copycats”. The Christchurch mosque shootings were one such atrocity, and we can draw a direct line for the same arguments to the horrors of Bondi earlier this year.
Yet I can’t count the number of times this weekend I’ve watched video, from multiple perspectives, of a blameless & public-spirited person being violently murdered by Government goons.
Generally the videos are at the top of an algorithmic feed – where frankly they deserve to be – so maybe the issue is more nuanced than “violent death”?
But try telling that to anybody in the online safety / “algorithms are evil” community in more polite times.
As per the attached: some of them got it, some of them did not, and for some of them it was a mixed and complicated issue; however today it seems currently to be crystallised in one direction only, that “filtering needs to happen” and “algorithms are bad”.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/859771857280618498
https://x.com/zeynep/status/859782381296902145And yet only 2 years later:
https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1120060705426821121
#censorship #contentModeration #onlineSafety #onlineSafetyAct