#nullresults

PS: I'm sympathetic to those short on time or caught up in job changes. But those pointing to #nullresults didn't understand the point of #preregistration. Those whose submissions were rejected by journals could still share the results as #preprints.

2025-02-16

PS: I'm sympathetic to those short on time or caught up in job changes. But those pointing to #nullresults didn't understand the point of #preregistration.

Those whose submissions were rejected by journals could still share the results as #preprints.

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2024-12-04

#238 Bridging null hypothesis testing and estimation

Thoughts: An overview of the ways you can claim "no effect" under a bayesian framework.

osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c7b45

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2024-12-02

#236 Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results

Thoughts: A bayesian way to investigate "no effect": Bayes Factors. Cool guide on how to think about priors (post hoc even).

frontiersin.org/journals/psych

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2024-10-18

#205 Equivalence Tests Using {marginaleffects}

Thoughts: Easily testing for "no effect" is important. Here's a tutorial by @carlislerainey using @VincentAB r pkg.

carlislerainey.com/blog/2023-0

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2024-10-11

#199 Mixed model equivalence test using R and PANGEA

Thoughts: While there are easier ways to compute tests for such models now, it is nice to see how you'd do so manually.

pedermisager.org/blog/mixed_mo

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2024-08-26

#166 Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results

Thoughts: Not sure how to set more meaningful priors for your Bayes Factors? This paper has a guidance. Great for simple designs.

frontiersin.org/journals/psych

Dorothy Bishopdeevybee
2024-03-24

A small rant about zombie ideas and the tendency to keep looking for modifications of study methods to avoid concluding that a null result is really null. deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/03/

WeAreSeismicaweareseismica
2023-07-30

attendees! As you submit your abstracts, remember: Results offer valuable lessons, even if they are not what you were hoping to get.

Embrace your null-results too! Check out our null-results reports in our type of publications for more information:

seismica.library.mcgill.ca/aut

Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴mzloteanu
2023-04-17

🚨My new paper is out. I explore the effect of uncertainty framing (epistemic or aleatory) on veracity judgements. The "negative" results indicate that phrasing the judgement as "how SURE are you... " vs "how LIKELY is it... " does *not* impact veracity judgments.

Zloteanu, M. (2023). Uncertain Veracity Judgements: Does the Framing of the Question Influence Deception Detection? Experimental Results, 1-16
doi.org/10.1017/exp.2023.9

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst