#ResearchIntegrity

OpenAIREOpenAIRE
2025-05-22

Special thanks to our host and organizer Jonathan England and our amazing Trainers & Mentors, Helen Clare, Pedro Principe, Milica Sevkusic, Pascal Flohr
Stay tuned — more to come from this inspiring week of capacity building under the PATTERN project!

Mr Tech Kingmrtechking
2025-05-20

Ouch. MIT just pulled a buzzy student AI paper claiming AI speeds up science while killing joy. Turns out, the data was bunk. A stark reminder that not all AI breakthroughs are real.

MIT Disavows Widely Shared AI Science Discovery Paper.
2025-05-19

Have an idea for advancing the information community? Donʻt keep it to yourself—whether itʻs about AI, research Integrity, open research, metadata, or something else, answer the call and submit a session proposal for our virtual #NISOPlus25 Global/Online conference! (Weʻd love to hear from you!) Submissions deadline is June 20: niso.plus/2025/05/niso-plus-gl
#ScholComm #libraries #publishers #AI #ResearchIntegrity #PIDs #metadata

2025-05-17

You say #OpenData is good for science?
🧪 What if it feeds paper mills & AI to churn out 2 fake papers a day?
Science sounds the alarm: public datasets are becoming raw material for junk science.
Time to rethink our standards.

#OpenScience #AI #PaperMills #ResearchIntegrity
🔗 doi.org/10.1126/science.zgawni

2025-05-16

🚨 Science is under threat and our Library @tibhannover is stepping up! To safeguard vital research, TIB has built a dark archive of #arXiv, preserving millions of scientific preprints in case the main platform goes down. A great step for resilient, decentralized access to knowledge worldwide!

#library #science #darkarchive #USPol #OpenScience #DigitalPreservation #ResearchIntegrity

blog.tib.eu/2025/05/14/protect

Serhii Nazarovetsserhii@mstdn.science
2025-05-16

📚 How can university libraries protect researchers from predatory journals?

At the national seminar on displaced university libraries, I presented a framework for creating local white lists of journals — not as a tool of restriction, but as a way to guide and support responsible publishing.

🛡️ VACUP criteria
📑 Journal screening tools
🌍 Nordic best practices
⚠️ How to spot red flags

📥 Full presentation: dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.338

#AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity #OpenScience

2025-05-16

Keynote on author identity from @alicemeadows this morning on the final day at our conference in Oslo.

The recent STM Association report on trusted identity recommends institutionally verified identity and using ORCID trust markers:
stm-assoc.org/new-stm-report-t

🧵
ease.org.uk/ease-events/18th-e

#EASEevents #EASEoslo #PIDs #Authorship #PersistentIdentifiers #Misinformation #ORCID #OpenInfrastructure #ResearchIntegrity

Alice Meadows at the EASE conference podium. She's a white woman with short greying hair, wearing earrings and a long blue patterned shirt.l and white trousers.How publishers can help

Encourage your community of authors, co-authors, reviewers, editorial board members, etc to get an ORCID ID and connect it with their other identifiers

Encourage them to use their ORCID ID and give ORCID members permission to update their records (note, auto-updates by Crossref, DataCite, and others are especially valuable)

Add your own service information (eg, editorial board membership, review contributions, etc) to ORCID records

Work with your vendors to ensure they read AND write trusted information from/to ORCID records

MOREBRAINS
2025-05-15

Practical Tips for Editors: Identifying hallmarks of suspected Gen AI and suspected image manipulation by Dan Stuckey at our conference in Oslo.

#EASEevents #EASEoslo #ImageManipulation #ScientificFigures #PublicationEthics #ResearchIntegrity #ScientificMisconduct #EditingTips #GenAI #GenerativeAI #ChatBots #AItools #AIethics #AIwriting

Practical Tips for Editors: Identifying hallmarks of suspected GenAI

Please read the manuscript!

Are there associated PubPeer posts (published articles/preprints)?

Is there evidence of GenAl prompts/output phrases?

Are there any fake or improbable references¹? (eg, hallucinated output)

Are there tortured phrases? (eg, "linear regression" becomes "straight relapse")

Does it contain outdated/unreliable information (limitations to LLM training data)?

Increase in prevalence of certain words² (eg, use of "delve", "intricate" and "meticulously" have spiked since 2023)

Are there stylistic anomalies within the manuscript or reviewers' comments? (eg, repetition of words/phrases; imprecise/superficial language)

Are there formatting telltales? (eg, information organised into sub-headings, intro, bullet-pointed list, outro)

Are there unusual features in images (eg, blurry regions; missing items; garbled labels, spelling mistakes...)

"Regenerate response"

"Please note that as an Al language model"

"Certainly! Here is a possible introduction to your topic"

...knowledge cutoff in June 2024."

"Ensure that all conclusions are strongly supported by the data presented."

doi.org/10.1016121240034

1. Walters, W.H., Wilder, E.I. Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Sci Rep 13, 14045 (2023).
2. Chatbots Have Thoroughly Infiltrated Scientific Publishing |
Scientific AmericanPractical Tips for Editors: Identifying suspected image manipulation

Check for image anomalies
Unusual contrast; artifacts; impossible features; obscured sections; hand drawn...
Do blots contain splices; duplicated regions; are too "clean"; odd features?

Have raw data been shared and verified?
Check for completeness; faithfulness; variability; have replicates been shared?

Check metadata
Who created file; when and where were images acquired; is file type consistent with what's described in the Methods?

Verifying image anomalies
Photoshop / Powerpoint (change transparency of top image and overlay to check similarity)
STM Image Alterations and Duplications Resource Center
Check that raw images reflect those in the manuscript / article
COPE Image Manipulation flowcharts

Escalate to institute?
Best placed to verify provenance of research; scrutinise lab books/hardware; interview
2025-05-15

Intercepting Misconduct - Practical Tips for Editors is chaired by Jason Roberts, with Paula Saikkonen, Dan Stuckey, and Ines Steffens.

Our final session today brings together experts sharing practical, low-cost ways to detect and prevent research misconduct - especially valuable for editors at smaller journals.

ease.org.uk/ease-events/18th-e

#EASEoslo #EASEevents #ScienceEditing #ScientificMisconduct #ResearchIntegrity

The panel posing for a photo and smiling at the EASE conference.
2025-05-15

"Clarivate has announced that, from 2025 (2024 data), citations to and from retracted articles will no longer contribute towards the Journal Impact Factor." - Research Information
researchinformation.info/news/

#ImpactFactor #JournalImpactFactor #Retractions #ResearchIntegrity #PublicationEthics #Citations #Bibliometrics

2025-05-15

My panel this morning at the European Association of Science Editors (@EASE) conference in Oslo was on the use of new tech in research integrity checks, alongside Caroline Sutton in person and Kim Eggleton and Jane Alfred online.

Our conversation was great (if I say so myself), helped by the chairing by Brian Cody. I thought it would be interesting to see how others here would answer Brian's questions:

1. What are the top research integrity concerns for scholarly publishers, and how much are they discipline-specific?

2. Technical checks can be overwhelming for journals. How to manage manuscript checklists from a process perspective?

3. How do publishers considering new automation / tools decide what's necessary vs nice to have?

4. Case studies of implementing tools.

5. Many tools only apply to English publications. What tools should non-English journals know about?

6. How can publishers and editors get involved in tool development?

7. What is the potential for AI to improve research integrity checks vs human oversight?

#ResearchIntegrity #PublicationEthics #AItools #Automation #EASEevents #EASEoslo #PaperMills #ScholarlyPublishing #ScholComm

2025-05-10

Joined the Elsevier-led editorial training for university journals.
Focused on editorial workflows, journal structure, and improving peer review processes.
Valuable insights for building strong, ethical, and scalable editorial teams.
#AcademicPublishing #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #EditorialWorkflow #PeerReview

2025-05-06

Panel: Preserving the integrity of the scholarly record at the upcoming EASE conference

🗓️ 15 May 2025 | 11:15–12:00

A conversation for editors on using rich metadata to support trustworthy research publishing. Learn key metadata elements and strategies to advance transparency and connectivity in scholarly outputs.

Read more: tinyurl.com/4mnkpd5v

#scholarlypublishing #metadata #researchintegrity

2025-05-01

Join us May 9 for an overview of the #RetractionWatch data now available in the Crossref REST API! We'll cover data collection, access, and why it's important for researchers, publishers, and institutions. We'll share a community example from Guillaume Cabanac on how the Problematic Paper Screener uses the Crossref/RW data. Register now: crossref.zoom.us/webinar/regis

#Webinar #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity

2025-04-25

Our paper "MIQE 2.0: Revision of the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments Guidelines" is now published in Clinical Chemistry! 📚🔬

This update addresses recent advances in qPCR technology, providing clear recommendations on sample handling, assay design, and data analysis. We emphasize transparency and reproducibility to enhance the reliability of qPCR research.

doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf0 #MIQE2_0 #MIQE #qPCR #ResearchIntegrity #ScientificMethodology 📊🔍

Screenshot of the MIQE 2.0 revision paper front page.
2025-04-16

Rachel Hardeman is an influential academic at the University of Minnesota. However, three of her colleagues are accusing her of plagiarism.

plagiarismtoday.com/2025/04/16

#Plagiarism #AcademicIntegrity #ResearchIntegrity

Take a moment to reflect: another respected science leader at the #NIH has been pushed out. Does sidelining top experts move science forward? Short-term politics, long-term damage. Some losses can’t be undone. #ScienceMatters #USPol #ResearchIntegrity

Chief of NIH’s international c...

Serhii Nazarovetsserhii@mstdn.science
2025-04-10

A small but telling academic exchange: Dr. Oviedo-García raised concerns about how we cited her 2021 paper on watchlists. We clarified it was only a historical reference to Beall’s lists - no claims implied.

:doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.

Elsevier’s editors now suggest we bury the hatchet. Gladly. 🕊️

#AcademicPublishing #CitationEthics #PredatoryJournals #ScholarlyCommunication #ResearchIntegrity

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Nazarovets, S., Daly, T., & Kendall, G. (2025). Response to comment on “The Chinese Early Warning Journal List: Strengths, weaknesses and solutions in the light of China’s global scientific rise.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 103049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103049

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst