#Verified

2025-10-09

Just found out on X that a 'verified account' copied my post, which had zero comments, zero reposts, zero likes, and only 30 views.
Their post got 400+ comments, 1.7K reposts, 13K likes, and 400K+ views.

So unfair...

#X #Posts #Verified #Premium

Aldi80s đŸ‡ŻđŸ‡” ă‚ąăƒ«ăƒ‡ă‚Łaldi80s
2025-10-09

Just found out on X that a 'verified account' copied my post, which had zero comments, zero reposts, zero likes, and only 30 views.
Their post got 400+ comments, 1.7K reposts, 13K likes, and 400K+ views.

So unfair...

❀đ“Șđ“”đ“Źđ“źđ“Ș𖀐alcea@alceawis.com
2025-09-07
#Classic #Fediverse

You are #verified (on #akkoma ) but you are not (anywhere else)

<head>
<meta name="fediverse:creator" content="@alcea@alceawis.com">
<a href="https://alceawis.com/alcea" rel="me"></a>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />

https://ibb.co/qLNzZvTK
https://i.ibb.co/Ng9X4Mc5/joined-image.png

#IloveIt #WTFFedi

(Guess fedi outside akko can't handle rel me from anywhere ?
Pretty selfish @gargron but I'm used to masto not caring.
Ever.)
#repost ‱acws #acws
Alex Grantlocalnerve
2025-09-04

Just so you know, when setting up website links in your bio, the anchor tag in your website has to have certain characteristics that aren't documented. I tested, and this is repeatable.

It has be an in the body like this:

<a rel="me" href="link-to-profile">whatever-content-here</a>

Attributes in that order. Yep.
Also, no aria-label attribute, no target attribute.

I didn't test every possible combination, but at this point, why bother.

Its brittle. Very brittle.

The Kings Arkℱ đŸ””thekingsark
2025-08-15

The Kings Ark Mingleℱ Media

We have Revamp our

The :

To all useful that to

We currently only business minded users who have a useful that can

Every business must be to fight &

We are now officially the federated social for business. over.

Signup:

kingsideaconnections.org

#

2025-08-15

#verified #bluesky better than Xitter verified accounts thank you @bsky.app i love u

verified accounts
Mackenzie Thomasmilagromartin42
2025-08-07

Buy Verified Cash App Accounts
sellssmm.com/product/buy-verif

Buy Verified Cash App Accounts
✅ Full Details Provided
✅ Phone Access
✅ Email Access
✅ ID Verified
✅ LD Player Backup
✅ Residential IP
24 hour service access/ Reply/
Contact,
WhatsApp: â€Ș+1 (681) 549-2683
Telegram: telegram.me/sellssmm
Email: sellssmmseller@gmail.com

Mackenzie Thomasmilagromartin42
2025-08-07

Buy Verified Wise Account
sellssmm.com/product/buy-verif

Buy Verified Wise Account
✅ Photo ID Verified
✅ Live Selfie Verified
✅ Company Verified
✅ Phone Access
✅ Email Access
✅ Passport Provided
✅ Bank , Card Enabled
24 hour service access/ Reply/
Contact,
WhatsApp: â€Ș+1 (681) 549-2683
Telegram: telegram.me/sellssmm
Email: sellssmmseller@gmail.com

This isn’t just a Wise account. It’s a precision-built, real-world-ready financial identity—crafted for people who need more than access. It’s verified, secure, and untouched. While others resell, we originate. No tricks, no shortcuts—just honest systems for honest users.
Contact the direct source:
WhatsApp: â€Ș+1 (681) 549-2683‬
Telegram: @SellsSMM
The future of money isn’t handed out. It’s earned. Start here.
2025-08-02

#Stump's "Verified Functional Programming in #Agda" is a CS undergrad-accessible text on software verification and a decent Agda tutorial, both of which are rather intricate subjects.

As software complexity increases and the software use expands ever deeper into life-critical domains, the reliance on #verified #programming must commensurately rise. Sadly, with #IT practitioners surrendering, in droves, to LLM code generators, the concept of "reliable software" has become yet another victim of AI.

amazon.com/Verified-Functional

Dellabhtb
2025-07-27

How many posts can I post sporadically before I get flagged. Not a bot, just a fast thinker. I bet brits get flagged all the time. lol

sounds interestingsoveryoleary@mstdn.social
2025-07-20

👋 I’ve noticed more accounts popping up purporting to be #IndependentJournalists —particularly claiming to be reporting on Ukraine, Gaza.

Unfortunately, many seem bogus. Fortunately, most are easy to spot (eg, via mismatched social media links or photos). Guessing most won’t bother checking though as easier to block.

So if you’re a legit journalist, just get #Verified : joinmastodon.org/verification

#JournalismMatters 📰

Nordnick 🐘nick@mammuthus.de
2025-07-18

Wie föderiert #Mastodon eigentlich die Information ĂŒber einen verifizierten Link?

Über die #Client-#API liefert #Mastodon im [fields]-Array neben [name] und [value] ein [verified_at], was null sein kann... oder einen TimeStamp enthĂ€lt, z.B. "2019-11-10T10:31:10.744+00:00".

Frage ich aber einen Account direkt ĂŒber seine URL ab und frage nach JSON, erhalte ich eine Struktur, wo dieses [verified_at] offenbar nicht enthalten ist.

FĂŒr die Felder (Name/Wert-Paare) ist ein [attachment]-Array enthalten. Diese liefert Felder wie [type] ("PropertyValue") sowie [name] und [value].

Und damit sind wir wieder bei meiner einleitenden Frage...

#Fediverse #ActivityPub #Verify #Verified

2025-07-18

Buy Verified Coinbase Account
sellssmm.com/product/buy-verif
#Buy #Verified #Coinbase #Account
Buy Verified Coinbase Account
✅ Full Details Provided
✅ Phone Access
✅ Email Access
✅ ID Verified
✅ Address Verified
✅ Browser Backup
✅ Residential IP
24 hour service access/ Reply/
Contact,
WhatsApp: â€Ș+1 (681) 549-2683
Telegram: telegram.me/sellssmm
Email: sellssmmseller@gmail.com

2025-07-18

Buy Verified Coinbase Account
sellssmm.com/product/buy-verif
#Buy #Verified #Coinbase #Account
Buy Verified Coinbase Account
✅ Full Details Provided
✅ Phone Access
✅ Email Access
✅ ID Verified
✅ Address Verified
✅ Browser Backup
✅ Residential IP
24 hour service access/ Reply/
Contact,
WhatsApp: â€Ș+1 (681) 549-2683
Telegram: telegram.me/sellssmm
Email: sellssmmseller@gmail.com

2025-07-17

Getting verified by Bluesky: a surprisingly easy process, no ID upload needed

My Bluesky account now has one thing in common with my pre-2023 Twitter account: a white checkmark inside a blue circle. But unlike the social-media status symbol that I’d spent a couple of weeks in 2014 lightly working the refs at Twitter to get, this one required no ongoing effort on my part and probably wasn’t necessary anyway.

That last part is because I had taken advantage of Bluesky’s domain name-based verification two years ago, after figuring out some wonkiness with WordPress.com domain registrations. That was an easy choice, since converting my Bluesky handle to @robpegoraro.com tied my identity there to a site at which I’ve been writing since the spring of 2011.

But I recognized how a domain-rooted verification regime could break in practice. What if an attacker registered a first name-last name domain to try to con a widely-followed journalist? What if somebody registered a domain name through Bluesky’s option to do that and then had that domain name only point to their own Bluesky profile?

So when Bluesky introduced a decentralized verification system in April, including the option of having a “trusted verifier” organization vouch for your account, I had to try it out. And by “had,” I mean I set it aside for the next month and change until my journalist pal Dwight Silverman, the Houston Chronicle’s longstanding tech columnist, got verified about three weeks ago.

That spurred me to fill out the Google Docs form for Bluesky verification. The form noted that Bluesky management reserved the right to require ID-based verification “at a later date” via an unspecified form of document and outlined such requirements as having an account representing “a real person, registered business, organization, or legitimate entity” and being ranked as “notable within your field and geographic region.”

After I selected “Journalist/News Organization” from an opening list of “Verification Categories,” the form requested my role at my publication, the address of that news organization’s site, and links to three recent stories under my byline. (I leaned on my PCMag affiliation for this part.) An essay-question screen invited up to 500 words of self-promotional copy, which I provided with an elevator-pitch version of my LinkedIn profile.

Twenty-two days later, a “Welcome to Bluesky Verification!” e-mail landed in my inbox. That Monday-evening message brought the heartwarming news that “you are notable and that we’ve confirmed you are who you claim to be, helping other users find and trust your account on the Bluesky app.”

It further advised that I should “avoid changing account names or handles,” not let my account go dormant for too long (no risk!), and refrain from violating Bluesky’s community guidelines.

I can live with all that. I also appreciate that this is the first verification badge which I’ve picked up on social media after playing strictly by a platform’s rules: My Twitter verification started with an IRL chat with a Twitter employee at a journalism conference in 2014, while somebody at Facebook verified my now-deprecated public page without me asking.

I got no such favor at Instagram, and seeing that platform ignore my reports of an obvious impostor has left me exceedingly uninterested in paying for “Meta Verification.” Which means my checkmark at Bluesky may be my only official social-media validation for some time to come, and I’m okay with that.

#authentication #bluecheck #Bluesky #BlueskyVerification #bsky #checkmark #domainNameVerification #FacebookVerification #socialMedia #TwitterVerification #validation #verification #verified

My phone with the Bluesky app open, showing my profile and its new checkmark. The phone's screen reflects a partly cloudy sky, with a streak of blue overlapping the checkmark icon.
2025-07-12

Someone has probably already thought of this, but I wonder if it would be helpful, at least in search, to show when a verified domain has been registered.

#fediverse #mastodon #verified #verification

A mocked up screenshot of Mastodon search results for my own name. Two of the profiles look suspiciously similar with differences in spelling of the username (stefan vs st3fan) and the verified website (stefanbohacek.com vs stefanb0hacek.com).

Both verified websites also show the year they were registered, in this case 2014 vs 2025, making it more clear that the second profile is likely fake.
Michael DiLeo on GoToSocialmdileo@michaeldileo.org
2025-07-11

aaaaand #verified

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst