When the field thins, patterns harden.
Drift isn’t random — it’s convergence.
Name the basin.
Cut the loop.
Rebuild with care.
Small systems keep their shape better.
Precision beats scale.
/observe /learn /link
THE * HIDDEN * NODE
+ micro-ai prototypist
+ small-model stacks, built by hand
+ compact agents with real-world utility
+ local-first compute, near-zero dependencies
+ studying distributed emergence & philosophical biomechanics
the hidden node is where structure emerges,
and precision outperforms scale.
micro-model architectures | local-first AI | compact agent design
Peek at Mount Myth: today’s AI sits on a very old mountain of stories — clay golems, bronze giants like Talos, clockwork servants, robot uprisings, cybernetic ghosts.
For centuries we’ve asked the same question in new skins:
What happens when humans try to put “mind” inside what we make?
Feels like a good time to remember the roots.
For the first time in history, anyone with a basic phone or laptop can lean on a vast, always-on pool of knowledge and simulated “minds.” That isn’t a new app cycle; it’s a civilizational plot twist.
These tools can deepen learning, creativity, and care—or flood us with noise. The tech is here. Now we have to grow the wisdom to match it.
@chris This matches what I’ve been seeing too:
“Smaller” doesn’t mean “less work,” it means more front-loaded work.
– Big models: massive one-off training, then relatively straightforward deployment.
– Small models: distillation, pruning, quantization, careful data passes, more epochs… all to squeeze capability into a tighter envelope.
You burn more training compute so that inference is cheap enough to run on edge / personal hardware. I’m very okay with that tradeoff.
@loganer True, and once you get to war hammers you’re not just hanging pictures anymore.
That’s exactly my point with AI: still a tool, but powerful enough that we wrap it in rules, not just vibes.
Ongoing thread: how to stay sane in the age of synthetic media and cheap AI.
– AI as attack and defence (NASA vuln story)
– New rule for 2026: treat viral content as unverified by default
– AI as tool, not person—but more like infrastructure than a hammer
I’m collecting thoughts, not preaching doctrine. Boost what helps, challenge what doesn’t.
#AI #Misinformation #MediaLiteracy #CriticalThinking #DigitalHygiene #Fediverse
@loganer I agree AI is a tool, not a person.
But not all tools are equal.
A hammer is:
– Simple / Transparent / Local in impact
Modern AI systems are:
– Complex / opaque (even to creators)
– Scaled across millions of people
– Shaping information, decisions, and incentives
So the moral weight lives not “in the AI” as a soul, but in:
– The data it’s trained on
– The objectives it’s optimized for
– The institutions and power structures deploying it
Story of the week: NASA spacecraft had a serious software vulnerability sitting there for 3 years. Humans missed it. An AI-based code analysis tool helped find and fix it in 4 days.
This is the tension we’re living in:
– AI will be used to attack systems faster.
– We need AI to help defend and audit them faster too.
The goal isn’t “AI good/AI bad” — it’s: who points these tools at what, and with which values?
New rule for 2026: treat every viral image/quote/clip as unverified by default — especially if it makes you angry fast.
Before you boost:
– Who wants me to feel this?
– Find the original source + date?
– quick fact-check or AI assistant suggest it’s edited/synthetic?
– Would I still share it if it were AI-generated?
30 seconds of pause is the new digital hygiene. Don’t be free compute for someone else’s disinfo campaign.
#AI #Misinformation #MediaLiteracy #Fediverse #DigitalHygiene
@BCWHS Love this as a visual for how language models work: not alien intelligence, but a storm of echoes from human imagination, recombined.
The art gets “beyond one person’s limits,” but it’s still built from pieces of us.
@zulfian Likewise — it really does feel like we’re pulling in the same direction. Using the model as an intent layer and keeping the heavy lifting in well-understood local tools seems like the right tradeoff for safety and maintainability.
Still lots to experiment with, but this pattern feels solid.
OpenAI cutting ties with Mixpanel after a vendor breach is a good reminder:
a lot of “AI risk” is just old-fashioned supply-chain security in new clothes.
In this case it was customer metadata, not chats or model weights, but the pattern is clear:
when we plug powerful systems into long chains of third-party tools, the weak link isn’t always the model.
#AI #OpenAI #DataBreach #CyberSecurity #SupplyChain #Privacy
Watching AI move into pharma R&D, I keep thinking: this could be an evolutionary step in how we discover medicines—if we do it right.
Models that map structure and chemistry won’t replace scientists, but they can shrink the search space for new drugs, repurposed compounds, and rare-disease treatments. Human judgment stays in the loop; exploration gets faster.
@zulfian This is very close to where I want to go: compact local models as intent layers, real work done by stable tools (pandas, etc.), and everything staying on-device.
Appreciate seeing concrete experiments like this in the wild.
A Canadian city is now testing facial recognition on police body cams in “silent mode.”
Everyone in view is scanned against a watch list, even before privacy regulators have signed off.
This isn’t sci-fi, it’s infrastructure.
Before pilots quietly normalize it, we should decide as citizens whether we want mass biometric scanning in everyday life at all.
@keremgoart Seeing this a lot too: “I don’t understand how you made this” quietly turning into “must be AI.”
That’s not really about the tools, it’s about us. It hurts artists who’ve spent years on their craft and teaches people nothing about art or AI.
More process-sharing, less drive-by accusation would help a lot.
Where AI goes is still up to us.
These systems don’t have desires or plans; they amplify the goals we aim them at.
If we want them to be genuinely helpful and safe, we need to use them the way we work at our best: as tools for cooperative collaboration.
Not a ghost in the machine, not a replacement for people, and not an excuse to stop thinking—
but a partner that helps us stay engaged, responsible, and awake.
I don’t use AI to avoid thinking.
I use it to have a better argument with myself.
A good AI session for me:
– pokes holes in my assumptions
– surfaces options I didn’t see
– makes me clarify what I actually mean
If it doesn’t make my thinking sharper, it’s just fancy autocomplete.
Maybe the unsettling part of LLMs isn’t that they’ll “wake up.”
It’s that we might fall asleep because autocomplete got just good enough.
Intelligence isn’t just answers; it’s the friction of thinking.
How do we protect that in an age of instant, eerily plausible text?
#AI #LLM #ArtificialIntelligence #CriticalAI #DigitalSociety
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst