Hot Take: The misinformation about the SSPL needs to stop.
If you disagree with the SSPL, that's fine.
But if you argue against what you think what the SSPL is, rather than what it actually is, you are actively harming the FOSS community.
The SSPL is based on the AGPL (Edit: It's actually based on the GPLv3). MongoDB (the company) has a nice little difference PDF that you can read. https://webassets.mongodb.com/_com_assets/legal/SSPL-compared-to-AGPL.pdf
The OSI says the SSPL is not Open Source. I understand their reasoning, and that's their prerogative. But I think this call was more harmful than it was beneficial.
The FSF said they'd look into the SSPL and make a comment, it's been a long while and they've been silent on the matter. Claims that the SSPL is not a Free Software license are false. Note that I'm also not making a claim that the SSPL is a Free Software license, because that equally lacks evidence.
I appreciate that people *really* do not like the requirements for Section 13. That's fine, if that's your beef with the SSPL, then say that instead of spreading falsities. I *really* don't like it when software fails to provide Freedom 3. I prefer copyleft licenses over permissive licenses. Some people prefer licenses that allow people to close the source later, I disagree with that.
Can we please just argue against realities, instead of fantasies? Thank you.
#FOSS #OpenSource #FreeSoftware #GPL #AGPL #SSPL