A post from August 2024 by @grimalkina, boosted by someone on another instance, about why to report demographics in research even when you're not studying those groups. This seems like a great primer for people who have little background in basic #sampling and #generalization (for some reason I can't link/boost from here, so):
https://mastodon.social/@grimalkina/112966685297897685
My 2 cents (already at least partially covered by Dr. Hicks):
1. Your study is never just about your study. Good science is #open and reusable. e.g., maybe your study on tech-enabled healthcare access isn't specifically about LGBTQ+ or Hispanic people, but what are you doing to help a researcher who comes along in 10 years? That information will change what they find and report.
2. Marginalized groups are often minorities, meaning representative probability samples (or --uncomfortable gesture-- convenience samples) for bread-and-butter research frequently have subpopulations too small for reasonable power in correlations, group differences, etc. That's just reality. It's also a big problem for our understanding of #marginalized + #minority groups. Oversampling or targeted studies of those groups are important. It's also important to have a large number of less-targeted studies with relevant information that can be synthesized later (see #1): one study with 1.3% trans participants doesn't tell us much about the trans population, but 20 studies, each of which has 1.3% trans participants, could tell us meaningful things.
3. Representation is important. My belief is that #marginalized+minoritized people need their identities and existence public and constant. In #science, both they and other people consuming the research will benefit from being reminded that they are there, almost always, in our #research.