Reading Macgilchrist for breakfast and I am struck by the line:
“designing EdTech is ontological in that it opens up — beyond ways of learning and ways of teaching — possible or impossible ways of doing, ways of being, and ways of desiring.”
The idea that students should see their own potential from classroom practices seems so logical for education, but sadly a lot of classroom time is completing task that students see as having no connection to their own being. And why is this?
Education should be transformative allowing for a qualitative change, not just incremental growth. But unless students feel entangle with the discussion and can “feel” how it affects them and their personal growth then a transformative qualitative emergence is lost.
This is the cost of education for testing. This is what the current forces of #EdTech are pushing for at light speed. In a test-oriented education industry where the testing means of production are completely owned by the tech monopolies, all future definitions of education will be dictated by the technocrats remotely and at speed.
This is the colonization of education through EdTech, with remote dictators, value extraction, and labor exploitation of the academic population.
We need digital sovereignty, and we need it today.
Here is the doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00389-y
Edit: Just realized @discoursology is on mastodon, so added.
And should mention that if you are doing COIL, this paper is a great read before planning your next exchange.
#digitalsovereignty #DigitalColonization #postdigital #designforlearning