#CosmologicalConstant

2025-06-12

Here is my next YouTube short about the great discovery by David Benisty et al. that the cosmological constant can be inferred from the Milky Way and Andromeda system! This is so important because it's a complementary probe to the CMB (Planck, ACT, etc.).
youtube.com/shorts/mwF0HhSu5yM

#astronomy #astrophysics #scicomm #outreach #CosmologicalConstant #YouTube

RationizedInsanity🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱🇵🇸RationalizedInsanity
2025-04-10

Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

It's the best explanation has come up with for the discrepancy in the and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

2025-03-20

Cosmology Results from DESI

Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

#baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

2025-03-19

The ACT-results are out! 🥳 It seems that the Atacama Cosmology Telescope supports everything we already know from WMAP & Planck... here are the publications:
arxiv.org/abs/2503.14452 (cosmology parameters)
arxiv.org/abs/2503.14454 (extensions beyond the standard model)

#cosmology #astrophysics #AtacamaCosmologyTelescope #CosmicMicrowaveBackground #CosmologicalConstant #CosmologicalPrinicple

2025-02-09

Happy belated birthday to the #CosmologicalConstant whatever you are in this #Universe !
#OTD February 8th, Einstein submitted this paper: einsteinpapers.press.princeton which is one of the rare cases in which he writes about #cosmology
Moreover, it also shows his pioneering thinking because he introduces what will later be known as the #CosmologicalPrinicple in this work, too!

#HappyBirthday #science #astronomy #astrophysics #HistoryOfCosmology

2024-12-03

#Waiting4WinterSolstice Part 3! Today I want to share another #astro #scicomm talk I liked very much, this time about how to constrain the #CosmologicalConstant from #LocalGroup dynamics. Enjoy: youtu.be/Kt3bCFxhxLo?si=tIj56L

A #physicist investigating #blackholes has found that, in an expanding #universe, #Einstein's #equations require that the rate of the universe's expansion at the #eventhorizon of every black hole must be a constant, the same for all black holes. In turn this means that the only energy at the event horizon is #darkenergy, the so-called #cosmologicalconstant.

phys.org/news/2024-06-behavior

Markus Redekermrdk@mathstodon.xyz
2024-05-03

@GerardWestendorp “One is the interchangability of mass and a constant potential” — This is a nice idea and already explains a lot.

It also resonates with an idea I once had, namely that in General Relativity, the effect of the cosmological constant \( \Lambda \) can be understand as generating special kind of fluid with stress-energy tensor

\[ T^{\alpha\beta} = (\rho + p) u^\alpha u^\beta + p g^{\alpha\beta} \]

and pressure \( p = \Lambda \) and density \( \rho = -\Lambda \).

This “fluid” is a bit strange — its density stays always the same and it has no speed with which it moves — but this idea helps to build intuition.

#GeneralRelativity #CosmologicalConstant

katch wreckkatchwreck
2023-06-20

"Rather than an expansion of space, spatial curvature, and small-scale inhomogeneities and anisotropies, this frame exhibits a variation of mass, length and time scales across . Alternatively, this may be interpreted as an evolution of fundamental constants"

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.04
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst