@_valerian_ Point commun au libre : le régime de propriété défini par une licence libre dont #Gnu, #Odbl, #creativecommoms
Les #communs : sous l'Ancien Régime, droits des communautés d'habitants de ramasser du bois mort, de faire paître les animaux, etc. Subsistance dans des usages aujourd'hui, comme l'affouage dans certaines #forêts communales (exemple personnel).
Fermeture des communs = #enclosure
Réflexions dans les années 1960 et 1970 sur ces #communs, comme Eline Ostrom.
@karussell They don't explicitly say that they're incorporating Open Street Map data---instead saying that you can bring "your" data alongside Google's---but, as evidenced by your screenshot, and by Google's intro video here at the 41 second mark:
https://youtu.be/g9F-_tCakL8?t=41
It certainly seems like Google views Open Street Map data as fair game for inclusion within their "Geospatial Reasoning" product. Their promotional material shows a map rendering that bears a very strong resemblance to Open Street Map's default "Carto" raster tile rendering style, encouraging their potential customers to believe the same.
That is as clear a violation of the ODbL as can be, which was written in large part specifically to exclude Google from using OSM data in its own customer-facing products. Laundering license violations through AI doesn't make them not violations.
#OpenStreetMap #OSM #Google #gemini #ai #llm #GIS #FOSS #ODBL
It seems that #Komoot guesses surface values if they are missing. Does anyone want to send an #ODbL request for the additional data or a machine readable description of the differences? #OpenStreetMap
@datagouvfr euh... uniquement les bases de données dérivées, pas toutes les réutilisations.
Exemple:
- je produit une carte à partir des données #OpenStreetMap (qui sont en ODbL),
- ma carte peut être dans la licence de mon choix (y compris non libre) et sûrement pas #ODbL car le plus souvent une carte ce n'est pas une base de données.
Non-altération et date du millésime ne sont pas des obligations de l'ODbL et le #RGPD est un tout autre sujet à ne pas mélanger.
#TIL that #OpenStreetMap's license changed from #CreativeCommons to #ODbl in 2012.
Alors que la plupart de la presse reprends la cartographie #OpenStreetMap sans mention il est a remarquer que Le Parisien fait mention sur une cartographie à petite échelle où la qualité d' #osm ne saute pas aux yeux.
Bravo à eux, honte aux autres, en particulier à ceux qui ne répondent pas aux mails, courriers, appels .... j'en connais ....
#presse #odbl #licence #
@hareldan I'm not sure #STAC (SpatioTemporal Asset Catalogs; https://stacspec.org) support for OSM editors would be worth the effort: Is there enough STAC-indexed imagery (or other STAC-indexed data) useful for mapping that is licensed such that using it for OSM mapping (and re-licensing the result under #ODbL with just "central" attribution on the OSM wiki rather than attribution embedded in the thusly created or modified parts of the OSM data and any derived DBs & works) is allowed?
@mattmarcha before you start working with this data source - make sure you're permitted to reuse the data for inclusion in #OpenStreetMap under the #ODbL
Well, I'm reading through it now, mere days before the book report's deadline (life has been kicking me while I'm down this past month; just lemme have this one). Keeping in mind that this was published in 2015, and likely worked on in 2013-2014, I'd say, so far (I'm finished with the first two, of eight, chapters), that the authors are... wildly optimistic in their prognostications. Their faith in capitalism is thoroughly baked into -- and yet completely unspoken in -- what I have read so far, and it borders on naïveté. Ethical questions are barely even raised, and there is no investigation made into them at either the textual or subtextual level.
As a former software engineer, their hope in Big Tech -- and particularly companies like Facebook and Google (the authors go so far as to nonchalantly suggest that a "genomic 'Facebook'" might one day exist, without casting any skepticism or aspersion toward that idea at all) -- is particularly misplaced when viewed through the lens of a decade of hindsight into the mess that surveillance capitalism has wrought. #23andMe has been presented as a success story, a particularly tragicomical specimen in light of its recent financial troubles and questions over ownership of the genetic data should it go bankrupt.
And that leads into what I suspect will be my primary gripe with the book: its (suspected) dearth of considerations for the licensing of genomic data and technology, about who gets to benefit from amassing such a corpus of genomic information, and on what terms. I have found myself at multiple instances, just in the first two chapters, already exasperatedly asking the authors: haven't y'all seen or read anything put out by @aral on the questions of data ownership? Is the field of #bioinformatics truly sleepwalking into the exact same quagmires that the #FreeSoftware world contended with, all without ever reading anything put out by @rms, by the @fsf, by the @conservancy, or by the @fsfe? Is our species, in yet another instance, going to prioritize private profit at the expense of public good? Nay, even publicly subsidize a for-profit sector that has no obligations to the public in turn?
If genetics truly is the source code of life, and our existing licenses for such source code are truly so "permissive" (or even non-existent) then our species is in very sorry shape indeed. To avoid a #cyberpunk future, I implore and entreat that we take inspiration from nature's viruses, and adopt viral, copyleft licensing for our collective genetic source code as a species. Genomics must belong to everyone, lest it become yet another tool of oppression. "Free Genomics, Free Society," as it were.
I see the nascent optimism of authors Field and Davies and raise them an equal dose of pessimism, administered one decade later.
#biocode #genomics #genetics #foss #FreeGenomics #CreativeCommons #ODBL #PublicMoneyPublicCode
Publication du guide pratique « Tout savoir sur la licence ODbL » par la Fédération des pros d’OSM https://linuxfr.org/news/publication-du-guide-pratique-tout-savoir-sur-la-licence-odbl-par-la-federation-des-pros-d-osm #licence_libre #openstreetmap #OpenData #copyleft #licence #odbl
la fédération des pros d'#openstreetmap dont je suis membre publie son premier guide, celui qui clarifie la licence #ODBL pour que vous puissiez mieux l'utiliser dans votre stratégie #opendata
https://fposm.fr/odbl
Elle a été distribuée pendant les #geodatadays de #nantes cette semaine pour la première fois.
C'est plein d'exemples et très rapide à consulter, à partager sans modération
Hmm, DoorDash is using @openstreetmap. Curiously without attribution, but at least it looks like they're using their own renderer, and it looks rather nice.
#OpenStreetMap #ODBL #HowHardIsItToSayThankYouAnyway #DoorDash #ItsNotThatHard
Une mention spéciale au journal Le Berry Républicain pour mentionner l'origine du fond de carte dans leur publication, #openstreetmap !
... Shame à d'autres titres, #sud-ouest, #lefigaro, .... qui piochent allégrement et mentionnent "Cartographie de chez nous"
#odbl
@march ja, finde es eine tolle Entwicklung, dass das mittlerweile fast selbstverständlich ist, wenn neue Datensätze/Dokumente veröffentlicht werden.
Leider ist "CC BY 4.0" nicht mit der #ODbL kompatibel, weshalb dieser Datenschatz leider nicht zur Verbesserung der Datenlage in #OpenStreetMap verwendet werden kann:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
@Hypatia Den Link kannst du auf jeden Fall ergänzen. Aber die Informationen daraus dürfen nicht für #OSM verwendet werden, da der Denkmalatlas laut Nutzungsbedingungen (Lizenz CC BY SA 4.0) nicht mit #OpenStreetMap (#ODbL) kompatibel ist.
Ein Foto kannst du mit der App @streetcomplete aufnehmen und mit der Notiz hochladen.
ça y est #panoramax permet enfin d'envoyer une séquence de photos géolocalisées via la page de notre compte, essayez donc!
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/envoyer
Créez un compte sur ce site avec votre compte #openstreetmap, go go go les #géocommuns
#openbuildings dataset released by Google is really impressive.
I'm curious why it hasn't been a big fuzz for the #geospatial people #deeplearning #remotesensing
It has been published under open licenses #odbl and #CCby4, choose your flavor.
https://sites.research.google/open-buildings/#explore
@OSM_tourism Was soll damit sein? Ich habe kein #Komoot App installiert aber ich denke schon, dass sie korrekt attributieren. Die Erwähnung von #OSM und #ODBL im "about" reicht aus.
Ein Popup beim Start der App wie du es beschreibst ist nicht erforderlich.
@OSM_tourism Muss es laut #ODBL aber auch nicht.
Ist es erlaubt eine Karte aus #OpenStreetMap auf ein Fotoprodukt, von z.B. https://www.cartida.de, zu drucken und zu verkaufen und den Lizenz-Hinweis auf der (nicht sichtbaren) Rückseite zu drucken?
