Warning, very long post ahead.
Iâm Aaron John Dizon, the person Howie Severino mentioned in his recent essay. He used my feedback on ableist language to explore a broader point, and while I welcome the conversation, it missed the deeper message of my advocacy.
Let me start by saying this straight:
IâM BLIND, AND IâM PROUD OF IT.
Being blind doesnât mean Iâm lost, stupid, or incapable of thinking for myself. So, when people use âblindâ as a negative word, like âblind faithâ or âblind obedienceâ, it hits differently. Itâs not just a figure of speech. Itâs a reflection of how society still connects blindness to ignorance.
Now, to be clear, I am not against the word blind. I am not trying to avoid it. In fact, itâs the exact opposite. I embrace it. I use it. I introduce myself as blind with pride. Even to my own three-year-old son, who might not yet understand what blindness fully means, I make it clear: Mama and Dada are blind. And he gets it â he knows we donât see like most people do, but he also knows that doesnât make us less. We move, we love, and we live fully. Thatâs the kind of understanding I want to grow in him, that blindness is not a curse, not a defect, not something to be pitied. Itâs just a part of who we are, and weâre proud of it. I love the word because itâs part of who I am, and it represents my strength, my independence, and my truth.
What I donât accept is when people use blind to mean something negative, when itâs used to describe people who refuse to think, who follow without question, who ignore whatâs wrong. Thatâs not what being blind means. So, when someone says âitâs just a metaphor,â thatâs where I draw the line.
In that essay, Howie quoted Aleeia saying:
âBefore people react or feel hurt, they should first look at where the word comes from, what it really means, and what the speakerâs intent was. Words donât always have the same meaning depending on the situation.â
And honestly, this is exactly the problem. That kind of statement blames the people who speak up, as if weâre too emotional, too sensitive, or too quick to be offended. It puts the focus on intent instead of impact. But intent doesnât erase harm. You donât get to say, âI didnât mean it that way,â and expect that to fix the hurt. Because the truth is, when you use âblindâ to describe people who donât think or who lack awareness, youâre still reinforcing the same old idea that blindness equals ignorance. And thatâs not something you can explain away with âcontext.â
Then she said:
âFor me, hearing the word âblindâ in this context isnât offensive at all. Just because a word is used doesnât automatically mean itâs discrimination or an insult. Some people get offended right away when they hear âblind,â but I think that reaction often comes from misunderstanding the context. In my case, I donât feel insulted when someone calls me blind, because itâs simply the truth. I am blind. Itâs a fact, not a negative label. And I donât treat my blindness as a problem I need to get rid of or a weakness I have to fix.â
See, this is where it completely contradicts itself. If you say youâre proud of being blind, good, so am I. but how can you defend people using our word to describe ignorance or lack of awareness? Thatâs not pride; thatâs permission. Thatâs letting others twist something we live and breathe into an insult.
True pride means defending the dignity of your identity. It means saying, âYes, I am blind, but donât use that word to describe whatâs wrong with the world.â
Howie also wrote that he âwonât promise to stop using those expressions,â but will âtry to be more thoughtful.â If you truly believe in inclusivity, you donât try, you do better. You listen, you learn, and you stop using words that reinforce discrimination, even unintentionally.
Letâs be clear: Howie didnât frame this as a nuanced discussion. Instead, he used Aleeiaâs comfort with the word âblindâ to counter my advocacy, which shifted the focus from a systemic critique to a personal debate. My lived experience and call for dignity became the âissue to be balanced,â rather than the perspective that needed attention.
This is not nuance, this is a shortcut in reporting that overlooked the full context. One blind personâs personal reaction does not invalidate a systemic critique about language and representation. Using a single perspective to soften anotherâs lived reality does not advance understanding, it obscures it.
True journalistic responsibility would mean engaging with the advocacy at its core, not reframing it as a matter of opinion to be âbalanced.â My feedback, the voice of someone directly confronting discrimination, deserves recognition, not sidelining.
And this, this is whatâs wrong with how media in the Philippines has shaped public thinking for so long. Weâve been portrayed as pitiful, helpless, or inspirational objects, never as equals.
Kaya ngayon, kapag may bulag na nagsalita tungkol sa respeto at dignidad, ang dali nating sabihan ng âUy, ang liit lang naman na issue,â or âbakit sobra kang galit?â
But no, this is not a small issue. This is exactly how discrimination survives through words, habits, and the excuses we keep making for them.
If you truly advocate for inclusivity, then you wonât defend a language that treats blindness like a defect or an insult. Youâll listen. Youâll rethink. Youâll open your eyes, ironically, thatâs what real awareness means.
This isnât about being sensitive. This is about being seen and respected, not as metaphors, but as people.
And to you, Aleeia, who is blind and supposedly understands the weight of our struggles, shame on you for defending those who use our identity as their shortcut to insult or ignorance. You, of all people, should know how it feels to live every day in a world that already misrepresents us, and yet here you are, siding with the very thinking that keeps us there. Thatâs not understanding. Thatâs betrayal. You didnât just miss the point, you helped prove why this advocacy is needed in the first place. Because if even one of us, a blind person, can justify this kind of language, then the problem runs deeper than ignorance, itâs internalized shame. And thatâs something we need to unlearn, not defend.
So yes, Iâll keep standing by what I said.
IâM BLIND, AND IâM PROUD OF IT.
But Iâll never stay silent when people, even those who share our blindness, allow the world to keep treating our word as something shameful.
â Aaron John Dizon
#Blind #ProudlyBlind #LanguageMatters #MediaResponsibility #Ableism #InclusiveLanguage #InclusionMatters #Bulag #SayTheWord #DisabilityPH #Philippines
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Ywx2BmQq/?mibextid=wwXIfr
https://www.gmanetwork.com/regionaltv/features/110728/essay-an-eye-opening-provocation-from-a-reader/story/#google_vignette/