👆
Oooo... will we see desktop mode on #EOS and #Graphene please?
#eOs
@moribundo Yo tengo mi #fairphone con #eOS y hasta ahora no me ha llegado la actualizacion a #android 15
Supongo que llegue cuando #eFoundation lo tenga bien pulido
Por el momento recibo mini actualizaciones casi cada mes
Journals | JEOS-RP
#NewArticle #OpenAccess
“Dual-window transformer framework with pyramid structure and constrained self-attention for hyperspectral anomaly detection”
✍️Lei Deng et al. from Army Engineering University of PLA, China
Read more ➡️ https://bit.ly/4oc00vl
Le Tholonet (Palette ): RĂ©union mensuelle de l'Axul, Le vendredi 14 novembre 2025 de 20h00 Ă 23h00. https://www.agendadulibre.org/events/33729 #linux #eOs #reunionMensuelle #logicielLibre #cultureLibre #telephoneLibre #ubuntu #debian #axul #adieuWindows
Votre téléphone est plein de pisteurs ? Il n'est plus mis à jour alors qu'il fonctionne encore très bien ?
Venez à notre flash-party de janvier pour installer /e/OS, un système alternatif qui reste compatible avec les applications Android !
Ce sera le samedi 24 janvier 2026 à la MJC Monplaisir (Lyon 8), inscrivez vous au plus tôt pour qu'on puisse vérifier la compatibilité de votre téléphone :
https://pretix.mossroy.fr/LyonCafeViePrivee/EcranTotal2026/
Journals | JEOS-RP
#NewArticle #OpenAccess
“Photonic crystal-like scaling behavior of localized Anderson modes in hyperuniform disordered systems”
✍️Nicoletta Granchi et al. from University of Florence, Italy
Read more ➡️ https://bit.ly/46X61Fa
EndeavourOS, vou lá!
Harbour Board, Dover Beach, England. April 2006. Ref-941
https://www.denisolivier.com/photography/harbour-board-dover-beach-england/en/941
#pier #denisolivierphotography #eos5d #eos #channel #dover #english #water #harbour #ramp #denisolivierphoto #port #canon5d #denisolivier #kent
#eos #1000d #photography #fotografie #stillersonntag #silentsunday #nature #natur #flamingo #animal #tier #bird #vogel
Voyez comment #eos protège mon appareil des tentatives de #pistage !
Pour savoir pourquoi les pisteurs d'applications mobiles sont l'une des #menaces les plus impactantes pour votre #vieprivee et votre #liberte , lisez notre Guide de Confidentialité : https://e.foundation/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/White_Paper_-_Privacy_-_FR.pdf
Hihhei, Fitbit toimii nyt e/OS:n kanssa! En oikein uskonut, että googlen appi yhtäkkiä alkaisi toimimaan enimmäkseen googlettomassa puhelimessa, mutta niin sitä näköjään outoja asioita sattuu.
I recently installed @e_mydata on an old phone.
And i must say I'm delighted. It feels snappy, installing aid is no problem without authenticating to the play store, everything works.
I still need to wrap around some features like parental control (how can i temporarily disable it e.g. to install apps?) and the multi user feature (how can i install apps for all users, make another user admin?).
Trying all this on an old phone enables me to test everything and prepare the next step to #degoogle
Last remark #eos is a terrible search term 🥴
Project 2025 Blueprint Versus The Second Trump Administration: A Narrative Comparison of Consequences
Editor’s Note: I struggled with Google’s NotebookLLM to get a decent comparison. I am learning its functions. It fails often. Anyway, here’s a comparison to real world events since Trump’s inauguration until now, and how any of those actions parallel the Project 2025 document from the Heritage Foundation (his Playbook). I made some edits, and my formatting. –DrWeb
Project 2025 Blueprint Versus The Second Trump Administration: A Narrative Comparison of Consequences
The philosophical premise driving the actions of the second Trump administration is rooted in the belief, articulated in the Mandate for Leadership 2025 document, that the American political elite has steered the nation toward decline. The authors assert that the federal government itself is a “behemoth, weaponized against American citizens and conservative values“, and the existing bureaucratic system is “not even close to the worst example of this corruption”. Therefore, the entire purpose of the transition effort is framed as the necessary deconstruction of the current system to restore the Republic to its “original moorings”.
This mandate translated directly into aggressive action immediately following the January 20, 2025, inauguration of Trump. Analyses confirmed a high degree of correlation between the blueprint and the administration’s policies. Within the first 100 days, analysts noted that more than 30 out of 47 initial executive actions matched or partially aligned with Project 2025 proposals. Furthermore, in less than a year, the administration began implementing almost half of Project 2025’s domestic policy To-Do List.
I. The Systematic Dismantling of the Administrative State
The primary goal of Project 2025—to dismantle the Administrative State—was executed through rapid and comprehensive personnel and structural changes:
The key mechanism for deconstructing the federal bureaucracy was the reinstatement of the concept behind the Trump administration’s previous “Schedule F” proposal. This was accomplished through the immediate signing of the order “RESTORING ACCOUNTABILITY TO POLICY-INFLUENCING POSITIONS WITHIN THE FEDERAL WORKFORCE,” aimed at stripping civil service protections from policy-influencing career roles. The Project 2025 blueprint views the federal workforce, where the dismissal rate is historically well below 1 percent, as lacking accountability relative to the private sector.
DOGE AI image, DDW Library…The execution of this mission was entrusted largely to the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk. While Project 2025 proposed detailed, structural reforms, DOGE’s approach was often described as hasty and chaotic. DOGE eliminated entire agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and USAID. This drive toward efficiency resulted in the layoff or planned layoff of 280,253 federal workers and contractors across 27 agencies, an action described in the sources as exceeding the specific, detailed methods recommended in the policy blueprint. The appointment of Russ Vought, an author of part of the Project 2025 guide, to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), provided direct policy linkage, fulfilling the demand that political leaders, not careerists, must drive agency agendas.
II. Cultural, Educational, and Regulatory Rollbacks
The administration also moved swiftly to implement cultural policies outlined in the blueprint:
On Day One, the administration signed an executive order ending all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs within the federal government. This aligns precisely with Project 2025’s demand to delete DEI, abortion, and gender equality “from every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation”. Regarding healthcare and gender policy, the administration was directed to withdraw March 2022 guidance on gender-affirming care and issued an order effectively barring transgender people from serving in the armed forces. Furthermore, a directive was issued to the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to reinstate service members discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine and to restore their rank.
Department of Education AI image, DDW Library…In education, the goal was to cripple public education. The administration took steps to dismantle the Department of Education via executive order, aligning with the Project 2025 goal of replacing federal oversight with state and local control. The administration also targeted academic funding. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced it would unilaterally cap the amount of funding for “indirect costs” at 15% for federally funded research. This fulfilled a specific Project 2025 goal to reduce taxpayer “subsidization of leftist agendas” in universities.
III. Energy, Environmental Policy, and Targeted Agency Actions
Deregulation and the reversal of climate policy were immediate priorities, consistent with the blueprint’s assertion that regulations threaten American communities:
The administration formally initiated the withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords and UNESCO, reflecting the blueprint’s goal of abandoning international organizations that erode sovereignty. Deregulatory actions immediately targeted environmental efforts by eliminating incentives for electric vehicles. A key target was the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Project 2025 explicitly called for NOAA to be “dismantled,” asserting that its Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) component was the “source of much of NOAA’s climate alarmism”. The administration subsequently attacked NOAA and dismissed scientists compiling the National Climate Assessments. The administration went beyond weakening regulations by pursuing repealing greenhouse gas standards altogether for fossil-fueled power plants.
Climate Change AI image, DDW Library…IV. Addressing Specific High-Consequence Actions
The below specific real-world consequences were analyzed against the Project 2025 agenda:
ICE AI image, DDW Library…- Forced Deployment of National Guard Troops: The administration federalized the California National Guard and deployed them along with Marines to Los Angeles against the wishes of the governor and mayor, and federal forces were sent to Memphis. While Project 2025 specifically mentioned using federal forces for border operations, this action aligns with the spirit of Project 2025 to assert maximalist federal control over domestic security issues, particularly in response to civil unrest.
- Threat to Resume Nuclear Testing: The administration’s policy position is in Direct Alignment and Implementation of the Project 2025 defense policy proposal. The blueprint recommends the President reject ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and signal a willingness to conduct nuclear tests in response to adversary developments, further directing the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to move to immediate test readiness.
- Aggressive Immigration Enforcement (ICE and Deportation): The administration initiated procedures for mass deportations (37,660 people were deported in the first month). It expanded detention capacity, including the Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center and “Alligator Alcatraz”. These actions align with the blueprint’s goal to end illegal immigration and drastically expand detention centers to 100,000 beds daily. Furthermore, the administration issued daily deportation quotas for ICE officers and ended the policy that restricted immigration arrests in “sensitive areas” such as courthouses, schools, and churches.
- Refugee Policy and Favoring White South Africans: The administration implemented a suspension of refugee entry under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. This fulfilled the Project 2025 goal of “rightsizing refugee admissions”. The administration was specifically criticized for fast-tracking the applications of 59 white South African refugees.
- Demolition of the White House East Wing: The demolition is related to the privately funded White House State Ballroom. This action is categorized as Outside the direct policy mandates of Project 2025, as the blueprint focuses on structural executive branch policy, not physical construction projects.
- Political Targeting and Ethics: Although actions like the unprecedented targeting of law firms and the alleged repeal of ethics rules are Outside the explicit policy mandates of Project 2025, they align with the administration’s overall focus on retribution and the maximalist assertion of executive power over perceived political enemies.
The sources confirm that the administration’s execution of its agenda since January 20, 2025, represents a powerful convergence with the detailed policy framework of Project 2025. The blueprint provided the conservative ideology and policy menu, and the administration’s actions provided the rapid, often radical, implementation.
Works Cited – Primary Volume
Primary Volume Entry
The Heritage Foundation, editor. Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise. The Heritage Foundation, 2023. ISBN 978-0-89195-174-2.
Individual Chapter Entries (Citations– by Author)
Berry, Jonathan. “Department of Labor and Related Agencies.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 581.
Burke, Lindsey M. “Department of Education.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 319.
Carmack, Dustin J. “Intelligence Community.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 201.
Carson, Benjamin S., Sr. “Department of Housing and Urban Development.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 503.
Cuccinelli, Ken. “Department of Homeland Security.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 133.
Dearborn, Rick. “White House Office.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 23.
Devine, Donald, et al. “Central Personnel Agencies: Managing the Bureaucracy.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 69.
Furchtgott-Roth, Diana. “Department of Transportation.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 619.
Gilman, Thomas F. “Department of Commerce.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 663.
Gunasekara, Mandy M. “Environmental Protection Agency.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 417.
Hamilton, Gene. “Department of Justice.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 545.
McNamee, Bernard L. “Department of Energy and Related Commissions.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 363.
Miller, Christopher. “Department of Defense.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 91.
Pendley, William Perry. “Department of the Interior.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 517.
Primorac, Max. “Agency for International Development.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 253.
Severino, Roger. “Department of Health and Human Services.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 449.
Skinner, Kiron K. “Department of State.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 171.
Tucker, Brooks D. “Department of Veterans Affairs.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 641.
Vought, Russ. “Executive Office of the President of the United States.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 43.
Walton, William L., et al. “Department of the Treasury.” Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise, edited by The Heritage Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, 2023, p. 691.
Tags: EOs, Executive Orders, Heritage Foundation, Mandate for Leadership, News, News Coverage, Parallels with Project 2025, Project 2025, The Conservative Promise, Trump#EOs #ExecutiveOrders #HeritageFoundation #MandateForLeadership #News #NewsCoverage #ParallelsWithProject2025 #Project2025 #TheConservativePromise #Trump
Client Info
Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst