Lmst

Fenomenología de la 'Slow Technology' en 2026: El auge de interfaces de demora deliberada como respuesta a la fatiga algorítmica. 🧠👾 🔗 https://www.glitchmental.com/2026/01/gen-z-obsession-tiempo-apps-lentas-2026.html #DigitalCulture #SlowWeb #GenZ #GlitchMentalMX

There is a specific kind of dignity in using software that doesn't want anything from you.
My Jellyfin server doesn't remove episodes due to licensing disputes. My RSS feed doesn't hide posts to force me to pay for "reach."
It’s not just about security, though that’s a huge gain from it, it’s about the relationship with the machine.
We got so used to being the product that we forgot what it feels like to just be the owner.
#DeGoogle #SelfHosting #Privacy #SlowWeb #Linux #foss

To save data expense and server load: Do you think it would be useful to know the size of a website before loading it? I mean, in the search result page. It could promote a lighter web. Is there any firefox extension to know it in Android? @ecosia

#solarpunk #smallweb #slowweb #lightweb #ecosia #sustainability #firefox #android

#Ahorrar dinero configurando #firefox y #uBlockOrigin para consumir menos datos y poder contratar una tarifa de datos menor.

Por defecto:
- Deshabilitar el filtrado cosmético.
- Bloquear elementos multimedia mayores que 1KB.
- Bloquear fuentes remotas.
- Deshabilitar JavaScript.

Las imágenes y vídeos solo se cargarán tras clicar sobre ellos.

Cuando una web concreta no funciona como queremos, se puede añadir fácilmente una excepción.

¿Alguna otra sugerencia? ¿Tiene sentido activar el control estricto de rastreadores que ofrece firefox, teniendo ublockorigin?

#sostenibilidad #smallWeb #lowtech #slowWeb #solarpunk #nowtopia

🌐🌿 Sustainable web practices:

Disallowing web crawlers? Only allowing the most 2-3 sustainable web crawlers? Only getting visitors from direct recommendations? Is editing robots.txt enough?

What do you think?

#noBot #noBigTech #searchEngine #AICrawler #robotsTxt #sustainability #lowTech #solarPunk #slowWeb #smallWeb

Dare to be Disconnected.

We are living in a permanent state of emergency, where every notification feels like a demand and every scroll feels like a duty. We have mistaken being informed for being engaged.

True presence is a revolutionary act in an attention economy. When you disconnect, you are not missing out. You are opting back into the physical world. You are choosing the air in the room, the weight of a book, or the person sitting across from you

Silence is not an empty space. Instead, look at it as it is where your own thoughts get a chance to be heard.

What would happen if you gave your full attention to something that couldn't give you a notification in return?

#DareToBeDisconnected #DareToBe #DigitalSovereignty #Privacy #SlowWeb #AttentionEconomy #DigitalWellness #Intentionality #NoAI #SimpleLiving #JOMO #TheQuietLife #Mindfulness #LowTech #deGoogle #RightToBeUnreachable #AnalogLife

A close up, wide-angle photograph of an open book with its pages fanned out. The focus is sharp on the edge of the cream colored pages in the foreground, while the background is a warm, soft blur of natural light and earthy tones. The image evokes a sense of quiet, stillness, and deep focus.

The Deep Dark Terroir of the Soul

This is the third and final part of the Thicket Series:
Part 1: Logic of the Thicket and the Unsearchable Web
Part 2: The Architecture of Resistance

The history of the working subject might be best understood not as a ledger of wages or a sequence of industrial breakthroughs, but as a study in the migration of the Master. In the eighteenth century, the Master was a concrete presence, a figure residing in the castle or the cathedral, distinct from the worker by a physical and social chasm. One knew where the authority lived because one could see the smoke from its chimneys. By the nineteenth century, this figure had moved into the factory office, closer to the rhythm of the machine but still identifiable by the suit and the watch. The twentieth century saw a further dissolution; the Master became atmospheric, blending into the very walls of the institutions that housed us—the schools, the hospitals, the barracks.

And yet, it is in the twenty-first century that we witness the final and perhaps most unsettling migration. The Master has moved inside. It has taken up residence within the worker’s own mind, adopting the voice of the ego and the language of self-optimization. This internal migration has fundamentally altered the nature of exhaustion, shifting it from the physical depletion of the muscle to a profound infarction of the soul. To understand how we might resist such an intimate occupation, we must trace the lineage of this fatigue, moving from Voltaire’s eighteenth-century refuge of the Garden to the contemporary diagnosis of the Burnout Society, and finally, to an emerging architecture of resistance that might be called the Logic of the Thicket.

Felsenlandschaft im Elbsandsteingebirge Caspar David Friedrich1822/1823

The story begins in 1759, amid the wreckage of a world governed by grand, often violent, narratives. When Voltaire published Candide, the prevailing philosophical mood was one of forced optimism. Leibniz had posited that we lived in “the best of all possible worlds,” a claim that felt increasingly like a cruel joke to those living through the arbitrary brutalities of the era—the Lisbon earthquake, the Seven Years’ War, and the relentless inquisitions of both church and state. For the subject of the 1700s, the Master was external and undeniable. Life was a sequence of calamities administered from above.

In the final pages of Candide, after a lifetime spent traversing a world of rape, slavery, and disaster in search of Leibnizian meaning, the protagonist reaches a quiet, radical conclusion. He rejects the grand debates and the lofty theorizing of his companions with a simple, grounded imperative: Il faut cultiver notre jardin—we must cultivate our garden.

At this historical juncture, the Garden was more than a hobby; it was a strategy of containment. It served as a physical and psychological wall against a world that had grown too chaotic to manage. Voltaire suggested that simple, manual labor was the only effective shield against the primary threats of the human condition, which he identified as the Three Evils: Boredom, Vice, and Need. In the Garden, work was a form of retreat. It solved the problem of Need by providing physical sustenance—potatoes and produce—at a time when biological survival was never guaranteed. It addressed Boredom by occupying the hands and the mind with the repetitive, rhythmic care of the earth, saving the worker from the existential dread of idleness. And it warded off Vice by providing a sanctuary from the moral decay of the court and the city, replacing political intrigue with the honest friction of the soil.

The Garden was a place of safety because it was bounded. To work was to narrow one’s world to the reach of one’s own hands, creating a small, controllable private sphere where the Master’s voice was, for a moment, silenced by the sounds of the harvest.

However, this sanctuary could not withstand the arrival of the steam engine. As the nineteenth century progressed, the Garden was paved over by the Factory. The peasantry was pulled from the land and funneled into the burgeoning cities, where the nature of labor underwent a violent transformation. Karl Marx, observing this shift, identified the collapse of Voltaire’s dream. In the industrial setting, the worker could no longer cultivate a garden because they owned neither the seeds nor the harvest. They did not even own their own time.

This was the era of Coercion. Marx’s diagnosis of Alienation described a worker severed from the product of their labor, from the act of production, and from their own Gattungswesen, species-essence. The Master was now the Capitalist, and exhaustion was a physical reality—a depletion of calories and muscle. Resistance, accordingly, was also physical: the strike, the riot, the seizure of the machine. The goal was to reclaim the physical Garden that had been stolen.

As we moved into the twentieth century, the nature of control shifted again. Physical coercion, while effective, was inefficient; it bred visible resentment and the constant threat of revolution. Systemic power realized it was far more effective to train workers to police themselves. Michel Foucault described this as the Disciplinary Society, where the factory model was replicated across all social institutions. The governing logic became the Panopticon—the internalized gaze. The worker of this era was a docile body, governed by the operating verb Should. You should be on time; you should follow procedure. While the Master was becoming more abstract—a set of norms rather than a man in a tall hat—the enemy was still technically outside. There was still a door one could walk through at the end of a shift.

The true transformation occurred at the turn of the twenty-first century, a transition captured with clinical precision by Byung-Chul Han. Han argues that the Disciplinary Society has collapsed, replaced by the Achievement Society. The modal verb has shifted from Should to Can. The demand is no longer “You must obey,” but “Yes, you can.”

This shift has proven catastrophic for the psyche. In the old world of coercion, there was a limit; when the shift was over, the worker was, in a sense, free. But in the Achievement Society, the worker is an “entrepreneur of the self.” We are no longer exploited by an external boss so much as we exploit ourselves. We voluntarily work eighty hours a week not because of a threat of the lash, but because of a desire to “optimize” our personal brands and “reach our potential.”

The Master has completed its migration. We carry the Panopticon in our pockets and in our egos. In this state, the Garden is no longer a retreat; it has become a performance stage. We still cultivate, but we do so frantically, documenting the process for the digital gaze, tracking our productivity metrics, and feeling a gnawing guilt that our harvest isn’t as aesthetic or impactful as our neighbor’s. The boundary between the private and the public has dissolved into a smooth, legible –searchable– surface.

In this environment of total transparency, the Three Evils have mutated into contemporary monsters. Need is no longer about physical starvation; it has become Status Anxiety—the insatiable requirement for recognition and digital legibility. Boredom has been replaced by Hyper-Attention; we are never idle, but we are never at rest, trapped in a shallow, frantic multitasking that Han calls the “vice of the click.” And Vice itself has become Self-Exploitation—the auto-aggression of working oneself into a depression under the guise of self-fulfillment.

By 2024, the smoothness of our digital existence had become total. Silicon Valley had successfully turned the world into a frictionless landscape where data and capital flow without resistance. Algorithms now manage the Uber driver and the freelance coder alike, using gamification to nudge behavior through a mathematical black box. We have become Tourists in a digital world built by others, wandering through clean, well-lit interfaces that prioritize searchability, SEO, above all else. If a thing is legible, it can be indexed; if it is indexed, it can be exploited.

This brings us to the threshold of 2025 and the emerging response found in the Logic of the Thicket. If the Garden was a strategy of containment and the Factory was a site of coercion, the Thicket is a strategy of opacity.

A thicket is not a garden. It is messy, dense, and difficult to navigate. It does not possess the neat rows or the clear boundaries of Voltaire’s refuge. Instead, it is defined by friction. To resist the smoothness of the modern Achievement Society, the worker must transition from being a Tourist to being an Explorer. The Tourist consumes intelligibility—the ease of the app, the clarity of the interface. The Explorer, by contrast, generates place through the introduction of friction.

The Logic of the Thicket suggests that we cannot return to the eighteenth-century Garden. The walls are too brittle; databases will index the soil and an AI will recommend the fertilizer before the first seed is planted. Instead, the modern subject must create contexts that are unsearchable. This does not mean a total withdrawal from the world, but rather an engagement on terms that are too complex, too local, and too nuanced for an algorithm to easily optimize.

We might re-examine Voltaire’s Three Evils through the lens of this new architecture to see if the Thicket offers a viable path forward.

First, consider the evil of Need. In our current context, Need has become the fear of Irrelevance. In a smooth world, the worker is a standard, interchangeable part. If your work is legible—easy to measure and automate—you live in constant fear of economic obsolescence. This is the condition of the smooth professional: the software engineer whose code is indistinguishable from the output of a Large Language Model, the copywriter producing content that mirrors a thousand other blog posts, or the middle manager whose primary function is the transmission of standardized project plans. These roles are vulnerable because they lack friction; they offer no resistance to the efficiency of the machine.

The Thicket addresses this through the concept of Terroir. In the culinary world, terroir refers to the specific qualities of soil, climate, and tradition that give a wine or a cheese its unreplicable character. In the world of labor, terroir is the infusion of one’s work with local context, historical depth, and human idiosyncrasy.

For this blog, the terroir is found in the deliberate, often difficult work of communal deep-reading and historical synthesis. Here, history is not viewed as a sequence of headlines, but as a series of vast, slow-moving machines—intellectual contraptions that take centuries to build and even longer to fully start. By examining the past through this mechanical lens, the thinker begins to see the world not as a “smooth” stream of current events, but as a dense thicket of long-term trajectories.

The process behind this blog—reading deep into difficult texts, engaging in exhaustive discussions with other thinkers, and synthesizing these influences through a deliberate collaboration with artificial intelligence—is itself a “thick” form of labor. It is a method of finalizing thought that creates a durable value, one that cannot be mimicked by a prompt-engineered shortcut. By making your work “thick”—laden with specific references, local nuances, and the friction of deep thought—you make yourself un-automatable. The machine can navigate a smooth database, but it struggles to traverse a thicket of idiosyncratic human insights that are anchored in the deep time of historical machinery. The Thicket ensures survival not by making the worker more efficient, but by making them indispensable through their unique, unsearchable “friction.”

Next, the evil of Boredom has mutated into Passive Consumption. We are over-stimulated but spiritually idle, doom-scrolling through a world where nothing we do actually changes the environment. We are Tourists in the digital landscape, consuming the “intelligibility” of others. The Thicket solves this by demanding active navigation. In a world where algorithms predict what we want before we know it, the Thicket reintroduces the struggle of discovery. You cannot be “bored” when you are bushwhacking through a complex structure of your own making, or when you are trying to understand the slow grinding of a historical machine that began its first revolution centuries ago. The joy of the Thicket is the joy of the Explorer—the realization that the landscape is resisting you, and that you must exert agency to move through it.

Finally, Vice has become Algorithmic Complicity—the moral laziness of letting an interface decide who we speak to, what we read, and how we spend our time. It is the vice of “disindividuation,” allowing ourselves to be smoothed down into a demographic data point. The Thicket forces a return to Virtue through Agency. To build a thicket is to refuse to be effortlessly “known.” It requires the “virtue” of privacy and the patience of shared inquiry. A “network” is smooth; you connect with a click. A “community” is a thicket; it requires negotiation, trust, and the willingness to engage with the “messiness” of other people. It requires the slow effort to inhabit a text that refuses to be summarized by an executive summary or a bulleted list.

The journey from 1759 to 2025 is a circle that does not quite close. Voltaire’s worker fled the violence of kings into the Garden, seeking a physical retreat. Marx’s worker lost that garden and fought to reclaim the tools. Han’s worker internalized the factory, turning their own mind into a sweatshop of positivity. And the worker of 2025 now realizes that the mind itself has been mapped.

The only remaining escape is to leave the Garden—which has become a trap of transparency—and enter the Thicket. There is a critical difference here: the Garden was intended to be safe, but the Thicket is defensive. It is a posture for a hostile territory. It saves us from Boredom by making life difficult again. It saves us from Vice by requiring conscious choice rather than algorithmic default. And it saves us from Need by ensuring we remain human enough that the machines cannot find a way to replace the specific texture of our presence.

It is a harder path than the one Candide chose, but in a world where the Master lives in the code, it may be the only path left. The mandate for the contemporary soul is no longer simply to cultivate, but to grow something so dense and so deeply rooted that the algorithm, for all its processing power, simply cannot find the way in. We look toward the edge of the woods, not for a way out, but for a way to disappear into the depth of the growth.

Coda: The Machinery of the Thicket

This essay is not merely a reflection on labor; it is a byproduct of the very “Logic of the Thicket” it describes. To write it was to engage in a form of “thick” labor—a deliberate resistance to the high-speed, surface-level synthesis typical of the Achievement Society. Below is the intellectual architecture and the process that generated this piece.

The Conceptual Bedrock

The essay’s trajectory is built on a specific lineage of thinkers who have tracked the migration of power from the town square into the central nervous system:

Voltaire (Candide, 1759): Provides the initial defensive posture—the Garden. His “Three Evils” (Boredom, Vice, Need) serve as the recurring benchmarks for human exhaustion.1
Karl Marx: Used here to mark the collapse of the private garden. The transition from Sustenance to Alienationis the first great rupture in the history of the working subject.
Michel Foucault: His concept of the Disciplinary Society and the Panopticon explains how the Master became “atmospheric.” It is the era of the “Should.”
Byung-Chul Han (The Burnout Society): The pivotal contemporary influence. Han’s shift from the “Should” (Foucault) to the “Can” (Achievement) explains why modern exhaustion is an “infarction of the soul.”
Yuk Hui: His work on Technodiversity and the “recursive” nature of history informs the transition from the Tourist to the Explorer. He suggests that we cannot escape technology, but we must diversify our localrelationship to it.

The Process: Generating “Terroir”

The writing of this piece followed a “thick” methodology designed to avoid the “smooth” output of standard digital content:

Deep Reading as Resistance: Instead of relying on summaries, the process involved “bushwhacking” through the primary texts. This creates Friction—the slow realization of meaning that cannot be automated.
Mechanical Synthesis: Viewing history as a series of Slow-Moving Machines. By treating the transition from the Printing Press to the LLM as a mechanical evolution rather than just “progress,” we can see the gears of authority shifting.
Collaborative Friction (AI as a Grinding Stone): Rather than using AI to generate the text, it was used as a sparring partner to test the “thickness” of the ideas. If the AI could predict the next point too easily, the point was discarded as being “too smooth.”
The Infusion of Local Context: The essay intentionally uses specific, non-indexable metaphors—like the Thicket and Terroir—to anchor the abstract philosophy in a visceral, earthy reality.

The Goal: The Unsearchable Life

The ultimate aim of this “Coda” is to encourage the reader to see their own intellectual life as a Terroir. The “Master in the code” thrives on standardized, legible data. By engaging in deep history, difficult synthesis, and private creation, you grow a thicket. You become a “place” that is too complex for a map, a subject that is too dense for an algorithm, and a worker whose exhaustion is finally, once again, your own.

#AchievementSociety #AI #AlgorithmicComplicity #Alienation #Art #artificialIntelligence #Automation #BurnoutSociety #ByungChulHan #Candide #CriticalTheory #CulturalCritique #DeepDarkTerroir #DeepReading #DigitalSmoothness #DigitalThicket #Enlightenment #Friction #HistoricalMachinery #history #HistoryOfLabor #HumanAgency #InfarctionOfTheSoul #KarlMarx #LLMs #MichelFoucault #Opacity #philosophy #PostDigital #Resistance #SelfOptimization #SlowWeb #SpeciesEssence #SpeculativeNonFiction #SystemsTheory #Technodiversity #technology #TheDisciplinarySociety #TheExplorerVsTheTourist #TheGarden #TheMaster #ThePanopticon #Unsearchable #Voltaire #writing #YukHui

Dare to be forgotten.

We have all been trained to think if we did not document it, it did not happen. We have turned our actual lives into content, constantly performing for an audience that isn't even really watching.

There is freedom in the undocumented. If you stop worrying about how a moment looks, you will start noticing how it actually feels. You no longer ask, "How will this look?" and instead ask, "How does this feel?"

Privacy is not just having secrets. It is having a life that belongs to you and not a data center. Some things should not be for sale. Some things are better when they are just yours.

What if the most important thing you did today was something nobody ever found out about?

#DareToBeForgotten #DareToBe #DigitalSovereignty #Privacy #SlowWeb #DigitalAsceticism #Intentionality #NoAI #SimpleLiving #JOMO #TheQuietLife #Mindfulness #RightToBeForgotten #LowTech #deGoogle

Dare to be inconvenienced.

We have been trained to prioritize "seamless" experiences over ethical ones. But every convenience has a hidden cost, whether it is labor rights, environmental impact, or the erosion of privacy.

Efficiency is a metric for machines, not for a meaningful life. When we stop choosing products solely for their convenience, we reclaim our agency. We choose local over global, human over algorithm, and sustainable over instant.

What would happen if we stopped using services that do very little good for society, even if it means taking the long way around?

#DareToBeInconvenienced #DareToBe #EthicalLiving #Intentionality #SlowWeb #noai #DigitalSovereignty #deGoogle #privacy #privacymatters #humanscale #degrowth #EthicalConsumerism #SupportLocal #AntiConsumption #LaborRights #SimpleLiving #Mindfulness #LowTech

Fun stuff! This page aggregates a random collage of stuff from the @internetarchive:

https://alivetheory.net/

(Still a little buggy. You may have to resize your browser window, in case you don't see the "Start Experience" button.)

#aliveinternettheory #alivetheory #oldweb #slowweb

Estou pensando seriamente em abrir um novo blogue chamado #Offpunk. Nele eu manteria um diário de bordo mostrando formas de resistir à digitalização, de viver sem a alta tecnologia e abrir caminhos para uma vida desconectada, independente das Big Tech.

Esse nome vem de um navegador feito para, acima de tudo, funcionar offline, que foi desenhado pelo escritor e desenvolvedor belga @ploum.

• Offpunk, an offline-first command-line browser.

Mas penso em antes desenvolver um postura e uma estética em cima desse conceito. O que nele se diferenciaria do #digitalminimalism é que estaria relacionado a coisas como: voltar-se ao #lowtech, ao comunitário, ao analógico, ao não elétrico; manter um estilo de vida de anticonsumo; e utilizar a internet de forma mais intencional, seguindo a #slowweb. Para tanto, acho que vale pensar também em dispositivos configurados para esse propósito. Nesse sentido um texto que traduzi chamado “Um computador feito para durar 50 anos” vai nessa direção.

• “O computador feito para durar 50 anos”, de Ploum

Os argumentos são os de sempre: ter uma vida mais balanceada, mais presente, menos vigiada e com os dados menos explorados, sem se abster totalmente, no entanto, dos serviços digitais. Ao contrário da postura neoliberal e individualista de buscar um #digitaldetox em prol da produtividade, gostaria de dar um teor político a essa estética, defendendo o acesso à cidadania e ao lazer sem o intermédio do digital, e o direito à privacidade e a uma vida lenta.

Estou retirando muitas ideias dos textos que leio do Ploum, do Low-Tech Magazine (também de origem belga inclusive) e também de um livro chamado “Digital Detox: a política da desconexão” (da escritora norueguesa Trine Syvertsen) ― que, se não me engano, ainda não foi traduzido para português (leio-o em inglês).

Acho que no começo do ano que vem faço ao menos um pequeno Manifesto Offpunk. Escrevo isso mentalmente até lá.

🎉 Nessuna raccolta dati su Linux.it e ILS.org – la tua privacy è al primo posto!

✅ Per massimizzare la protezione dati abbiamo ROTTO il nostro server Matomo per errore 😂😂

Dona a Italian Linux Society e aiuta a mantenere un web etico! bello ancor di più quando è rotto! Dona via bonifico o PayPal.

Se doni 3€ oggi, licenzieremo il nostro futuro addetto alla comunicazione (colui che vuole i tuoi dati) 😁

https://www.ils.org/info/#donazioni

#decrescitafelice #slowweb

How to detect “Slow Web” writing through text analysis:

• Average sentence length → depth of reflection

• First-person rate → level of introspection

• Emotion polarity (lexicon-based) → calm or neutral tone

• Buzzword ratio → viral or performative bias

• Abstract/concrete balance → sincerity of voice

• Style variance → steadiness of thought

A quiet algorithm to find thoughtful writing.

#SlowWeb #TextMining #DigitalHumanities #LoFiThinking #IndieWeb

In the 1990s, the web felt hand-made and diverse —
a place where people shared raw thoughts,
not personal brands or business or platform bias.
Maybe it’s time to rediscover that slower, smaller web again.
To seek essential, thoughtful information —
not the viral noise of likes, rankings, or social feeds.

#SlowWeb #IndieWeb #LoFiThinking #SmallInternet #DigitalGarden