#so2

2025-12-14

#climate #volcano #VolcanicEruption #emissions #so2

Original open access article

Marshall et al. Clim. Past, 21, 161–184, 2025

Last-millennium volcanic forcing and climate response using SO2 emissions

doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-161-2025

2025-11-03

Daniel Swain patiently explains SO2 unmasking, what was known, what was expected, and what's now on the research agenda. Here as sub-thread:
bsky.app/profile/weatherwest.b
What I now understand:

Heating from less shipping 🚢SO2
of all GHG that were already in the atmo
has now been accomplished. ✅

Loss of clouds also adds more heating power to all further added GHG in the atmo (more than modelled for today's stage of our path to CO2-Zero).

But that's a tiny amount:
add heat ONCE to 3350 Gt vs add heat🌡️to new 40 Gt per year !

Not even 40Gt/yr because half of that annual CO2 emission amount still gets sucked up by ocean and land sink. Only 20Gt CO2 end up permanently the atmosphere for now.
So really not a lot of additional CO2 to "get heated" by the loss of SO2-clouds.
Compared to the one-time only heating of a hundred times more CO2, 3350 Gt = 430ppm.

Now I understand that there is NO reason why the sudden warming jump should become a new feature for the next decades as well.

Daniel amplifies that it is unfounded to extend the increased warming rate decades into the future
(like it's being done by Hansen, and very prominent on Social Media: by Leon Simons, see attached table.)

Daniel "admits" that the asynchronous reduction appears to have caused a greater forcing increase in some specific regions than the synchronous model calculations would suggest. bsky.app/profile/weatherwest.b

Urgent research is ongoing why that might be the case.

#climateChange #climateimpact #SO2 #atmosphere #IMO2020 #WarmingRate

Table by Leon Simons titled "Global Warming has Accelerated Significantly"
Subtitle "Grant Foster andStefan Rahmstorf (2025 preprint)".

I added the original table from the preprint on the top right corner where Foster and Rahmstorf calculated the current heating rate and likely crossing point of 1.5C in various observation analysis datasets.
The table only lists the 1.5C crossing year and the warming rate, no other crossing points and rates.
Average rate 0.43C per decade, cross point on average 2026. 

Leon Simons has added 5 more columns with fictitious crossing points and rates for 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4C warming.
He makes these columns look like as if they were part of Foster & Rahmstorf's table. 
Only his last footnote clarifies that he added these columns himself. 

I always found this addition and the layout of the table and subtitle very misleading, and deliberately misleading. Attributing Simons' guesswork to well-known scientists is very bad form. 

Source preprint: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6079807/v1

source Leon Simon's misleading table https://bsky.app/profile/leonsimons.bsky.social/post/3lzofvq4eo22c
2025-11-02

Or maybe not forever?

But as long as fossil forcers are added to the atmosphere?

They used to have a warming potential of x degrees.
And that calculation was spot on when you compare Exxon's own warming projections with reality today.

But it was spot on without considering the added cooling from SO2 [over land and ocean].
So now, with SO2 going away, the fossil forcers get more power than they used to have.

Add yet more fossil forcers, and the warming rate increases compared to Exxon's calculations.

What happens when the adding of fossil forcers finally stops?

Hm. Until then, it gets hotter than Exxon predicted.
But then?
Is the lack of SO2-clouds then still an active warm-er compared to Exxon's calculations?

The oceans then still continue to take up more heat than Exxon knew.
For 2 reasons: 1) because Exxon didn't know about the SO2-clouds and the air is simply hotter than they had calculated.
2) oceans continue increased heat uptake and subsequent release for lack of clouds – increased when compared to calculations.

Grmpf. But not increasing over time anymore? NO. NOT increasing over time anymore because adding fossil forcers has stopped.

Ah, I don't know. All I know is that I doubt my old belief was true.

#climateChange
#climatefeedbacks
#atmosphere
#ocean
#cloud
#SO2

2025-11-02

I have a broken logic board when it comes to lost cloud cooling from SO2 reduction.

I used to think:
you take SO2 away, and the atmosphere heats up by 0.x degrees, and afterwards, the forcings from GHG pile on that new level of achieved heat. But SO2-reduction from x Mt per year to zero is more like an event, and when zero is reached, it stops adding heat.

Now I think different and I really need help getting my head around it.

A stretch of ocean from now on is exposed to direct🌞and takes up more heat.
Every day its >layers< heat more, ie faster than before. Forever.
To me, it sounds like the recent growth rate must continue. Eg, 2023: +0.01*, 2024: +0.011, 2025: 0.012, 2026: 0.013 forever?

*dunno what the real cloud effect is. +0.01 in 2023 is only a guess for sake of the illustration.

Important with the ocean's exposure to direct sun is that it has layers. Yesterday's additional °C gets mixed down by wind and waves. But it also comes up again and re-interacts with the atmo= warms it today.

How is it with land?
When SO2 stops over hard land surface, lost cooling is a one-off and won't add °C beyond its local potential.
??? No, that can't be right.

( Over land, SO2 reduction also lets forests recover from acid rain – which increases cloud formation around "VOC", or call them tree pheromones. Over land, this new cloud formation mechanism counters the lost clouds from reduced SO2 pollution to some extent. Seen a paper somewhere saying by 40%. )

Now I think, in both environments, lost SO2 cloud-cooling is a gift that keeps on giving MORE. Not a single warming potential, but a forever growing heat addition.

Help?

#climateChange #climatefeedbacks #atmosphere #ocean #cloud #SO2

2025-08-14

Wat tonen de satellietbeelden van vandaag? #cams #fijnstof #so2 #zwaveldioxide #O3 #ozon #no2 #stikstofdioxide

A new study connects recent regionally confined warming in China 2010ff to their strive for healthy air by scrubbing SO2 from their coal chimneys. *

In other news, India is lambasted by a politician for excluding most of their coal chimneys from SO2 scrubbing regulation. **

And here's a curious side effect of acid rain from SO2:
it reduces CO2 emissions from soil 💡
sciencedirect.com/science/arti "Acid rain reduces soil CO2 emission and promotes soil organic carbon accumulation in association with decreasing the biomass and biological activity of ecosystems: A meta-analysis" by Ziqiang Liu et al 2022

So when large areas simultaneously get rid of SO2 pollution
, CO2 emissions start to rise noticeably? Europe's SO2 reduction was fastest, USA is her typical laggard, and China began 2010ff and is now already on par with a mid-1990s Europe, much faster than USA.

My musings:
I guess, it means, once the soil removes the acid, CO2 emissions start to rise.
AFAIK, acid removal is no automatism in forest soil but I can imagine, removal from agricultural land happens automatically bit by bit during subsequent harvests? (Yum!)

Germany distributed chalk or something to her forest soils to counter the acidification and to rescue dying forests.

But. Plants and other beings suffer during acidification. And when forests recover they raise their carbon uptake. Crop yields also recover when the soil does, I reckon. (Indeed! see *** and pic 2, and also ****. Now I wonder whether the elsewhere celebrated yield gains are more due to cleaner air than genetical engineering and pesticides!)

Maybe, CO2 emissions from soil are balanced out by increased carbon uptake from healthier beings.
Does the paper say anything about all these musings?

"Overall, the responses of soil GHGs emissions to acid rain vary across different ecosystems, climates, soil types and experimental duration, and thus no consensus has emerged yet" 😁

* "East Asian aerosol cleanup has likely contributed to the recent acceleration in global warming" by Samset et al nature.com/articles/s43247-025
A Conversation piece by the authors: theconversation.com/cleaner-ai

** "‘Faulty premises’: Jairam Ramesh slams govt after it eases SO2 emission norms" theprint.in/india/faulty-premi

*** "The negative effects of simulated acid rain on maize physiology, grain quality and yield in a field trial" by Jidong Liao et al, 2025 sciencedirect.com/science/arti

**** "More Power Generation, More Wheat Losses? Evidence from Wheat Productivity in North China" by Fujin Yi et al 2024 .
link.springer.com/article/10.1

#SO2 #AcidRain #SoilBiodiversity #soil #carbonUptake #CO2 #greenhousegases #agriculture #forest #cropyield #ClimateChange

Graphical abstract for how acid rain affects soil and plant processes. 
It appears that with more acid in the soil Aluminum and iron ions are set free. And these ions shrink plant roots and decrease general biomass activity and diversity. 

source:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0341816221005725graphical abstract for how maize yield is negatively affected by acid rain. 
Maize yield redcued by 17%
Photosyntethetic efficiency decreased by 23%
Ear height decreased by 11%
Stem diameter decreased by 11%
Fructose content decreased by 16%
Glucose content INcreased by 79%

source: 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1309104224003477
César Pallares :damnified:copdeb@metalhead.club
2025-04-30

@rmounce However Ross. I'm believing that #SO2 might be one of the Most sustainable routes to #OpenAccess.

I'm really critical of Diamond Open Access as "The Route" for what I've seen in #Latinamerica

Due to acid rain, countries lowered SO2 emissions from industry and power plants. But SO2 is also a coolant via cloud-seeding aerosols. See Glen Peters' tweet: globally -0.5°C from 2010-2019. A very short lifetime of mere days means, SO2 molecules cool only locally, while methane and CO2 heat all.

SO2 is emitted by burning coal and ship fuel, & in #volcanism.
The other major coolant NOx, also short-lived with regional not global direct forcing, is emitted by burning fossil fuels eg in cars, and lightening storms & biomass burning.
So when our emissions drop, local heating goes up: " #TerminationShock".

When I say "local heating goes up", I should add that via wind and land-atmosphere and ocean-atmosphere interaction, this local heating also has global repercussions. Eg., wind drives the warm-er air parcel across the globe. So a warmer China and Japan who ditched SO2 and NOx, also heat the #Pacific.

Lowering SO2 and NOx while N2O (fertilizer), CH4 and CO2 emissions still rise is rather stupid.
#climate #climateChange #methane #SO2 #NOx #atmosphere #ocean

6 charts with regional SO2 emissions, 3 as stacked version, showing the sum of emissions within the region, and 3 as independent lines for regions.
Peak SO2 for European regions was 1979, then quickly reduced to near zero by 2010.
Peaks for Northern America and Russia were 1973 and 1993 respectively. Russia's SO2 only dropped a little and stayed the same since 1997. North America got to near zero by 2015. 
In Asia, China stands out with a rapid increase of SO2 emissions from the early 2000s, peaking in 2008, followed by a rapid decline to its 1980-level emissions of 10Mt SO2.
The other Asian regions, India, West Asia, Central Asia, Southern Asia,  are still growing their SO2 emissions. 

source: OurWorldInDataTweet by Glen Peters saying that without SO2 emissions, the world woukd be 0.5C warmer. 
Attached is a chart showing all GHG concentrations from 2010 to 2019 and their respective contribution to warming.
CO2 contributed 0.78C, SO2 cooled by 0.5C, and CH4 warmed by 0.5C.

8 more GHG are in the chart. All combined made up 1.1C warming over pre-industrial.Short-lived climate forcers as a table. The lifetime of SO2 is stated as days. The other major coolant NOx lives hours to days. 
Methane CH4 lives 9 to 12 years before it is broken down and warms the planet 80 times as much as CO2 does. 

source: AR6-WG1 chapter 6, table 6.1
2024-10-02

お久し振りです!おかきでは主にスク●ニさん多めゲームの二次創作中心に描きます。一枚目は昼に上げた絵の再掲、残りは五か月前に投稿した再掲絵です!ご無沙汰すぎる…!!
#10月になったので自己紹介しようぜ #一次創作 #二次創作 #SO2    #FF8 #サガフロ

🧿🪬🍄🌈🎮💻🚲🥓🎃💀🏴🛻🇺🇸schizanon
2024-09-15

There is a company launching into the stratosphere to release () to reflect sunlight and stop

You can sponsor a balloon on their website

makesunsets.com/products/join-

Norobiik @Norobiik@noc.socialNorobiik@noc.social
2024-07-03

Since #Kanlaon’s June 3 #eruption, #SO2 emission “has been persistently elevated,” averaging 3,254 tons per day.

When the volcano is not in a #StateOfUnrest, the typical emission is only less than 300 tons per day. #KanlaonVolcano #Philippines

90 Kanlaon #VolcanicEarthquakes recorded in just 21 hours
rappler.com/philippines/visaya

KANLAON VOLCANO. The volcano as seen from the observation station in Canlaon City, Negros Oriental, on July 2, 2024.

PHIVOLCS
2024-04-29

おかきでは主にゲーム二次創作(ほぼスクエニかつ懐かしめ)の絵描いてます~とここぞとばかりに過去絵再掲!
#gwはフォロワーさんが増えるらしい
#二次創作 #SO2 #DQ11 #DFF #サガフロ #りのせ版権絵

I looked at North #Atlantic SST monthly growth rates along the shipping routes in 2degree longitude bands to investigate some more what occurred in crazy 2023 – for which less #SO2 from shipping is made out as THE culprit by some people.

The chronology in Chart 1 shows that 2023 wasn't a singularity: 2017-2018 looks similar. 1994-1995 as well, but with the highest growth rates in Center-West longitudes since 1986. So 2023-2024 might just be such a freak occurrence like the other two. They lasted from October to September 1994-1995, and from August to May 2016-2017. The 2023 freak started in June, so might last to May? We’ll see. But I don't see how shipping SO2 should be THE culprit. 🤔

Chart2 is sorted on months. When you mentally divide the columns in 3 groups, West-Center-East, and evaluate the variation between dark and orange in the groups, it appears that the winter months December - February in Center and East gained in variability since 2008, while summer months June-September lost variability 2016ff (or 2011ff for July only).

See text shot for more info on what the charts show. Data: coastwatch.noaa.gov
#climate2023 #ClimateCrisis

Textshot: "
	Chart 1 is the year-on-year monthly growth rate of the sea surface temperature in a part of the North Atlantic from 35°N (Spain) to 55°N (Ireland), averaged on a longitude grid of 2° width. Data shown is from daily satellite observation from 1986-April to 2024-March. Source https://coastwatch.noaa.gov 
	The latitude selection, 35°N to 55°N aimed to cover the shipping routes while avoiding getting too far into Cold Blob / Subpolar Gyre to not muddy the waters too much with that special feature. I probably should even have limited it to 50°N. Ah well. 
	The colouring is given for each longitude time series and the Total Result (=median of all cells). It’s following a "Conditional Format" on 50th percentile= darkest is lowest growth rate from 0 to 40%, highest growth rates are orange from 70 to 100%. 
	Each January and the whole year 2020 are marked in red in the time column. 
	The columns begin in the West and end East. It helps to mentally divide them into 3 groups, West, Center, East. 
	Chart 2 is the same data and formatting, except it's sorted on months, and only 2020 is highlighted in red. Each longitude's month time series is colour-formatted individually.Chart 1 as described in the text shot. 2020ff and 2023 do not look so extremely out of place as I expected from staring at daily SST evolutions.Chart2 as described in the toot and the text shot. Looks chaotic but is a treasure trove for feeling oneself into the system and the seasons.
2024-03-30

Salts of Protonated Sulfur Dioxide Synthesized:
Elusive hemi- and monoprotonated SO2 cations isolated as Sb2F11− salts

chemistryviews.org/salts-of-pr

#chemistry #chemistryviews #chemviews #research #so2

Salts of Protonated Sulfur Dioxide

Someone had the idea that less SO2 has reduced rain in Cote d'Ivoire and reduced cocoa harvest. Fascinating! So I plotted #GRACE surface moisture % and #SO2 by #CAMS for the rectangle -8°E to 0°E, 4°N to10°N . Chose this rectangle bc I had planned to also use GHCN precipitation data from stations in the country. But it turns out their reporting is ... spotty – and that's putting it very politely😁

SO2 total column 🤎 data goes to Dec 2022. #NASAGRACE drought monitor for surface moisture 💙 goes to Feb2024. According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theobrom , cocoa trees are sensitive to surface soil moisture. But no harvest month is stated which wd have been interesting to know here.

I see no correlation between GRACE and SO2. Do you?
What's more, I also don't see a big drought that would explain the low cocoa harvest. Also what little GHCN precipitation data there is even suggests higher than average rainfall for the years 2019-2023. Ah well. Mabye it was pests that killed the harvest?

#chocolate #ClimateChange #cocoa
data:
NASA GRACE drought monitor:
nasagrace.unl.edu/globaldata/
CAMS SO2 total column monthly:
ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/c
GHCN /byStation:
www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gh Ivory Coast station names begin with IV

3 charts from 2003 to 2024 showing surface moisture in % and SO2 concentration total column for an area roughly covering Ivory Coast. 
Top: chronological plot.
Middle: chronological plot but with monthly year-on-year growth in SO2
Bottom: same as top chart but sorted on months.
The bottom chart is most informative regarding seasonal variation and their trend in moisture and SO2. Winter months show the highest SO2 values, up to 1400. Summer months have very low SO2, about 200. Surface moisture varies a lot year on year, no season distinguishable but that's maybe bc GRACE % data is a sort of monthly anomaly. Linear trend is up.
Trend for years 2020 to 2022 are insignificant overall. Except December which was lower than usual in SO2 the past few years. Likely due to warm European winters.   
sources:
NASA GRACE drought monitor: 
https://nasagrace.unl.edu/globaldata/
CAMS SO2 total column monthly: 
https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/cams-global-reanalysis-eac4-monthlyAverage daily rainfall per month in 16 weather stations in Ivory Coast reporting to the Global Historical Climatological Network. The screenshot covers data from April 2005 to November 2023. Instead of bars or lines, this chart is using Conditional Formatting with 3 colours per station . The middle colour, green-ish teal is around the 50th percentile, Dark colour is little rain, orange colour is much rain.
The chart only shows those months with 15 or more or 20 or more days reported. 20 or more days is a very rare occurrence, maybe 2 months per year on average, some stations far less. 
The colour coding suggests a little more rain than average since 2019.  But data is really not continuous enough to even make this timid statement.
2024-01-28

#Air quality in #Valencia today is poor, due to particulate matter pollution, but the #SO2, #NO2 and #O3 levels seem to be ok. What does this mean, then? Is this another cloud of Saharan dust? If it were due to combustion, those other pollutants' levels would surely be elevated, no?

(((Jann Gobble)))🏳️‍🌈jann@twit.social
2024-01-14

Off to watch the last three eps of #Loki #So2! Pray for me...

Client Info

Server: https://mastodon.social
Version: 2025.07
Repository: https://github.com/cyevgeniy/lmst